Managing the Cascading Risks of Droughts: Institutional Adaptation in Transboundary River Basins
AffiliationUniv Arizona, Sch Govt & Publ Policy
MetadataShow full item record
PublisherAMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
CitationGarrick, D. E., Schlager, E., De Stefano, L., & Villamayor‐Tomas, S. (2018). Managing the cascading risks of droughts: Institutional adaptation in transboundary river basins. Earth's Future, 6, 809–827. https://doi.org/10.1002/2018EF000823
Rights©2018. The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License.
Collection InformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at email@example.com.
AbstractTransboundary river basins experience complex coordination challenges during droughts.The multiscale nature of drought creates potential for spillovers when upstream adaptation decisions have cascading impacts on downstream regions. This paper advances the institutional analysis and development (IAD) framework to examine drought adaptation decision-making in a multijurisdictional context. We integrate concepts of risk management into the IAD framework to characterize drought across its natural and human dimensions. A global analysis identifies regions where severe droughts combine with institutional fragmentation to require coordinated adaptation. We apply the risk-based IAD framework to examine drought adaptation in the Rio Bravo/Grandean archetypical transboundary river shared by the United States and Mexico and by multiple states within each country.The analysis draws on primary data and a questionnaire with 50 water managers in four distinct, yet interlinked, institutional catchments, which vary in terms of their drought characteristics, socioeconomic attributes, and governance arrangements. The results highlight the heterogeneity of droughts and uneven distribution of their impacts due to the interplay of drought hazards and institutional fragmentation. Transboundary water sharing agreements influence the types and sequence of interactions between upstream and downstream jurisdictions, which we describe as spillovers that involve both conflict and cooperation. Interdependent jurisdictions often draw on informal decision-making venues (e.g., data sharing, operational decisions) due to the higher transaction costs and uncertainty associated with courts and planning processes, yet existing coordination and conflict resolution venues have proven insufficient for severe, sustained droughts. Observatories will be needed to measure and manage the cascading risks of drought.
NoteOpen access journal.
VersionFinal published version
SponsorsSocial Sciences and Humanities Council of Canada [430-2014-00785]; Water Economics, Policy and Governance Network (WEPGN) - Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) Partnership Grant; European Commission funding under the Marie Curie Actions-Individual Fellowship [660089-COMOVE, H2020-MSCA-IF-2014]