Geologic Evaluation of Yuma Basin for Carbon Dioxide Sequestration Potential
KeywordsArizona Geological Survey Open File Reports
Colorado River Delta
Basin and Range Province
Department of Energy
basin fill sediments
MetadataShow full item record
CitationGootee, B.F., 2013, Geologic Evaluation of Yuma Basin for Carbon Dioxide Sequestration Potential. Arizona Geological Survey Open File Report, OFR-13-04, 17 p., 3 map plates and 3 appendices.
PublisherArizona Geological Survey (Tucson, AZ)
DescriptionThe Yuma basin is located in the southwestern Basin and Range Province of Arizona adjacent to the San Andreas Transform boundary and the Gulf of California. The Colorado River marks the western boundary of the Yuma basin for the purposes of this study, although it has no subsurface significance (Plate 1). Similarly, the Arizona-Sonora border marks the southern boundary of the Yuma basin for the purposes of this study, but also has no subsurface significance. The southwestern part of the Yuma basin is, geologically, part of the Salton Trough (Plate 1). Along the flanks of the basin are the northwest-trending Chocolate Mountains in California to the northwest, Laguna and Gila Mountains to the north and northeast, and Tinajas Atlas Mountains to the east and southeast. The Colorado and Gila rivers pass through the northern mountain ranges and converge in the Yuma Valley with the Colorado River continuing southward. . The Yuma Desert and Luke Air Force Range make up a large portion of the Yuma basin. The Yuma basin is separated into two subbasins by a northwest trending bedrock ridge that is buried in most places, forms several low hills, and connects the Cargo Muchacho Mountains in California with the Tinajas Atlas Mountains in northwestern Sonora. This ridge separates the Yuma basin into two subbasins, referred to as the San Luis subbasin in the southwest and the Fortuna subbasin in the northeast (Mattick and others, 1973). The Yuma basin as defined above is the second largest Cenozoic basin in Arizona, with an estimated volume of 2,497 km3 underlain by Cenozoic basin-fill sediments, 1,437 km3 of which lie below 800 m (2,625 ft) depth (Spencer, 2011). A maximum depth of approximately Arizona Geological Survey 2 3,795 m (12,450 ft) is modeled from gravity by Oppenheimer and Sumner (1981). Basin-fill sediments in the Yuma basin occupy an area of approximately 1,780 square kilometers (km2) (690 square miles (mi2)). Basin-fill sediments below a depth of 800 m occupy an area of approximately 1,130 km2 (435 mi2), or 63% of the Yuma basin.
RightsArizona Geological Survey. All rights reserved.
Collection InformationDocuments in the AZGS Document Repository collection are made available by the Arizona Geological Survey (AZGS) and the University Libraries at the University of Arizona. For more information about items in this collection, please contact email@example.com.
North Bounding Coordinate32.75
South Bounding Coordinate32.25
West Bounding Coordinate-114.75
East Bounding Coordinate-114.25
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Chemical quality of water in relation to water use and basin characteristics, Tucson Basin, ArizonaFeldman, Arlen.; Simpson, Eugene S.; Dutt, G. R.; Ferris, J. G. (The University of Arizona., 1966)The areal distribution of the chemical quality of the Tucson basin ground water has been mapped. The basin was divided into five study sections, according to the relative concentrations of the chemical ions studied, The five chemical quality sections are as follows: 1. Canada del Oro; Catalina, Tanque Verde, and Rincon Mountain foothills and extension into the northeast half of the basin low concentrations except for Tanque Verde anomaly. 2. Tucson-Benson Highway area extending from east of Vail northwest to the Santa Cruz Rivermoderately high concentrations. 3. Foothills of the Santa Rita and Sierrita Mountains extending to the Santa Cruz bottom land moderate concentrations. 4. The Santa Cruz bottom land from Arivaca to Rillito moderately high to high concentrations. 5. The Tucson Mountain foothills extending to the Santa Cruz bottom land low - moderate to moderately high cone entrations0 The water quality of these sections is correlated to the geology of the basin, according to the principles set forth in the section on the "Geochemistry of Ground Water." The effects of man's lowering of the water table are not as yet evidenced in the chemistry of the ground water In conclusion, the part of the Rillito Creek drainage basin in the northeast Tucson basin fill is found to have both the best water quality and the highest specific capacities of the entire basin. Subsurface storage and impermeable boundary limitations may restrict further development of this area, however. Artificial recharge into this aquifer, from Rillito Creek, could alleviate the quantity problems.
The Tajik Basin: A composite record of sedimentary basin evolution in response to tectonics in the PamirChapman, James B.; Carrapa, Barbara; DeCelles, Peter G.; Worthington, James; Mancin, Nicoletta; Cobianchi, Miriam; Stoica, Marius; Wang, Xin; Gadoev, Mustafo; Oimahmadov, Ilhomjon; et al. (WILEY, 2019)Investigation of a >6-km-thick succession of Cretaceous to Cenozoic sedimentary rocks in the Tajik Basin reveals that this depocentre consists of three stacked basin systems that are interpreted to reflect different mechanisms of subsidence associated with tectonics in the Pamir Mountains: a Lower to mid-Cretaceous succession, an Upper Cretaceous-Lower Eocene succession and an Eocene-Neogene succession. The Lower to mid-Cretaceous succession consists of fluvial deposits that were primarily derived from the Triassic Karakul-Mazar subduction-accretion complex in the northern Pamir. This succession is characterized by a convex-up (accelerating) subsidence curve, thickens towards the Pamir and is interpreted as a retroarc foreland basin system associated with northward subduction of Tethyan oceanic lithosphere. The Upper Cretaceous to early Eocene succession consists of fine-grained, marginal marine and sabkha deposits. The succession is characterized by a concave-up subsidence curve. Regionally extensive limestone beds in the succession are consistent with late stage thermal relaxation and relative sea-level rise following lithospheric extension, potentially in response to Tethyan slab rollback/foundering. The Upper Cretaceous-early Eocene succession is capped by a middle Eocene to early Oligocene (ca. 50-30 Ma) disconformity, which is interpreted to record the passage of a flexural forebulge. The disconformity is represented by a depositional hiatus, which is 10-30 Myr younger than estimates for the initiation of India-Asia collision and overlaps in age with the start of prograde metamorphism recorded in the Pamir gneiss domes. Overlying the disconformity, a >4-km-thick upper Eocene-Neogene succession displays a classic, coarsening upward unroofing sequence characterized by accelerating subsidence, which is interpreted as a retro-foreland basin associated with crustal thickening of the Pamir during India-Asia collision. Thus, the Tajik Basin provides an example of a long-lived composite basin in a retrowedge position that displays a sensitivity to plate margin processes. Subsidence, sediment accumulation and basin-forming mechanisms are influenced by subduction dynamics, including periods of slab-shallowing and retreat.