An Evaluation of Carbon Dioxide Sequestration Potential in the Higley Basin, South-central Arizona
Issue Date
2013-07-03Keywords
Arizona Geological Survey Open File ReportsTertiary
Pleistocene
Quaternary
Holocene
Basin and Range Province
Queen Creek
Higley basin
Gilbert
Maricopa CountyWestcarbDOEclimate changebasin fillCO2carbon sequestrationbasin analysis
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Gootee, B.F., 2013, An Evaluation of Carbon Dioxide Sequestration Potential in the Higley Basin, South-Central Arizona. Arizona Geological Survey Open File Report, OFR-13-10, 14 p., 6 map plates and 2 appendices.Publisher
Arizona Geological Survey (Tucson, AZ)Description
The Department of Energy (DOE), including its National Energy Technology Laboratory has established national programs to evaluate the technical feasibility of long-term subsurface geologic storage of carbon dioxide (CO2) produced by industrial activity. West Coast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (WESTCARB) is a consortium of seven western U.S. States and one Canadian Province that is one of seven regional North American partnerships established to evaluate technical aspects of high-volume CO2 capture and sequestration. Collaborative WESTCARB research programs have included more than 90 public agencies, private companies, and non-profit organizations. The Arizona Geological Survey (AZGS) began work in 2010 on WESTCARB Phase III – Arizona Geological Characterization (California Energy Commission Agreement Number 500-10-024). As part of WESTCARB Phase III, AZGS is evaluating the potential for CO2 sequestration in geologic formations that are below a level of 800 meters (m) (2,625 feet (ft)) depth below land surface (bls). This evaluation is directed at porous and permeable geologic formations with impermeable sealing strata in Cenozoic sedimentary basins in the Basin and Range Province, and Paleozoic sedimentary formations in the Colorado Plateau. An initial screening of Cenozoic sedimentary basins with significant depth and volume below the 800 m bls level resulted in ten candidate basins from a total of 88 basins (Spencer, 2011). This report represents ongoing WESTCARB assessment of CO2 storage potential in Higley basin, one of ten Cenozoic basins in Arizona identified during the preliminary evaluation, and is part of Tasks 2 and 3 of Arizona WESTCARB Phase III. Task 2 consists primarily of characterizing basin structure, stratigraphy, lithology, and, if present the nature of impermeable sealing strata that could effectively prevent upward migration of stored CO2. This task also includes determining the storage capacity of permeable strata below 800 depth (Spencer, 2011). Task 3 is to determine if, and at what depth, saline groundwater exceeds 10,000 milligrams per liter (mg/L) of total dissolved solids (TDS), characterized in a separate study (Gootee and others, 2012). This concentration represents the threshold above which water is considered non-potable and unsuitable as drinking water (United States Environmental Protection Agency). Individual-basin studies such as this study are intended to provide estimates of the volume of permeable strata that are capped by impermeable strata (with an interface at depths greater than 800 m), and that are saturated with saline groundwater (>10,000 mg/L TDS). Higley basin is a northwest-trending Cenozoic basin in the south-central portion of the Basin and Range and southern margin of the Transition Zone tectonic provinces, with basin-fill sediment up to 3,600 m (12,000 ft) thick (Plate 1). The cities of Tempe, Mesa, Chandler, Gilbert, Queen Creek and the Gila River Indian Reservation occupy Higley basin. Higley basin is part of the Gila River watersheds, occupied primarily by the Queen Creek tributary. Higley basin is one of ten largest Cenozoic basins in Arizona identified as having CO2 Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS) potential (Spencer, 2011) with an estimated volume of 1,492 cubic kilometers (km3) (358 cubic miles (mi3)) of Cenozoic basin-fill sediments. Approximately 574 km3 (138 mi3) of sediments are estimated to lie below a depth of 800 m (2,625 ft).Additional Links
http://repository.azgs.az.gov/uri_gin/azgs/dlio/1522Language
enSeries/Report no.
OFR-13-10Rights
Arizona Geological Survey. All rights reserved.Collection Information
Documents in the AZGS Document Repository collection are made available by the Arizona Geological Survey (AZGS) and the University Libraries at the University of Arizona. For more information about items in this collection, please contact azgs-info@email.arizona.edu.North Bounding Coordinate
33.5South Bounding Coordinate
33West Bounding Coordinate
-112East Bounding Coordinate
-111Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Determining Areal Precipitation in the Basin and Range Province of Southern Arizona - Sonoita Creek BasinA linear relationship between point precipitation and elevation in conjunction with a computer four-point interpolation technique was used to simulate areal rainfall over Sonoita Creek Basin, Arizona. The simulation's sensitivity and accuracy were checked against the official isohyetal map of Arizona (Univ. of Arizona, 1965) by changing the density of the interpolation nodes. The simulation was found to be in good agreement with the official map. The average areal-rainfall was calculated by integration. Cumulative rainfall amounts were assumed to be stochastically independent from one season to another. The seasonal precipitations of forty years (1932-1972) were subdivided into five groups. to check for binomial distribution. The binomial model fits the historical data adequately. The binomial model for cumulative seasonal areal-precipitation provides one way to compute the return period. This information will be necessary for decision-makers and hydrologists to predict the area's future water balance.
-
Incorporating social-ecological considerations into basin-wide responses to climate change in the Colorado River BasinDuring the last 50 years, construction of dams in the western United States declined. This is partly because of increasing recognition of diverse and unintended social-ecological consequences of dams. Today, resource managers are recognizing the wide array of tradeoffs and are including a more diverse group of stakeholders in decision making for individual dams. Yet decisions at the regional scale maintain a focus on a limited number of resources and objectives, leading to inefficient and inequitable outcomes. Social-ecological changes compounded by climate change challenge this management paradigm. Increasing water demands for humans and the environment and renewed interest in hydropower present opportunities for operations that include climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies while considering tradeoffs and equitable responses at the regional scale.
