An Investigation of Thermal Springs throughout Arizona: Geochemical, Isotopic, and Geological Characterization, Arizona Basin and Range Province
| dc.contributor.author | Love, D.S. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gootee, B.F. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cook, J.P. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mahan, M.K. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Spencer, J.E. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-11-10T01:10:39Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-11-10T01:10:39Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014-08-18 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Love, D.S., Gootee, B.F., Cook, J.P., Mahan, M.K. and Spencer, J.E., An Investigation of Thermal Springs throughout Arizona: Geochemical, Isotopic, and Geological Characterization, Arizona Basin and Range Province, 2014, Arizona Geological Survey Open-File Report -14-06, 129 p. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/630705 | |
| dc.description | Under the Department of Energy (DOE) National Geothermal Data System (NGDS) (Contract DE-EE0002850) Supplemental Data project to discover new geothermal data, the Arizona Geological Survey (AZGS) investigated the geochemical makeup of groundwater from select thermal springs and wells during late 2012 through 2013. In addition, the related geological context was investigated to evaluate potential groundwater transport mechanism(s) and heat source(s) relevant to geothermal energy production. Chemical analysis of thermal groundwater may be used to estimate subsurface temperatures by applying chemical geothermometry techniques, thus attempting to specify reservoir temperatures and to model possible sources of heat. An exploration program that integrates geochemical indicators of aquifer geometry and temperature with geology, geophysics, well targeting and well testing is likely to lower the cost of building sufficient confidence in resource conceptual models capable to commit to a generation capacity and plan well targets for development (Powell and Cumming, 2010). This report is intended to discuss the geochemistry and geology in relation to the select hot springs and wells sampled throughout Southern Arizona. This report presents the data and our interpretation to the extent of our limited understanding of geochemistry and complex factors that contribute to the geothermometry. It is meant to provide data for geothermal experts and others interested in pursuing additional interpretation. The geothermometry model devised by Tom Powell and William Cumming (Powell and Cumming, 2010) supports many of the common graphic analyses of water chemistry used to interpret hot spring and thermal well groundwater in geothermal exploration and development. The model provides geochemistry interpretative tools with proven value in exploring and characterizing the properties of both volcanic and forced-convection geothermal reservoirs. Cross-plots and ternary diagrams are generated from measured concentrations of chemical species using formulas based on equilibrium reactions and empirical relationships. | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Arizona Geological Survey (Tucson, AZ) | |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | OFR-14-06 | |
| dc.relation.url | http://repository.azgs.az.gov/uri_gin/azgs/dlio/1579 | |
| dc.rights | Arizona Geological Survey. All rights reserved. | |
| dc.subject | Arizona Geological Survey Open File Reports | |
| dc.subject | Arizona | |
| dc.subject | energy | |
| dc.subject | isotopic | |
| dc.subject | hot springs | |
| dc.subject | geothermal | |
| dc.subject | Indian Hot Springs | |
| dc.subject | Buena Vista Hot Springs | |
| dc.subject | Cactus Flat | |
| dc.subject | Safford | |
| dc.subject | Willcox | |
| dc.subject | Yuma | |
| dc.subject | Cofer Hot Spring | |
| dc.subject | Kaiser Hot spring | |
| dc.subject | Castle Hot Spring | |
| dc.subject | Tonopah | |
| dc.subject | Hooker's Hot Spring | |
| dc.subject | Pinaleno Mountains | |
| dc.subject | Tucson Basin | |
| dc.subject | Agua Caliente | |
| dc.subject | hydrology | |
| dc.subject | groundwater | |
| dc.subject | geothermometry | |
| dc.subject | chemical geothermometry | |
| dc.title | An Investigation of Thermal Springs throughout Arizona: Geochemical, Isotopic, and Geological Characterization, Arizona Basin and Range Province | |
| csdgm.bounding.west | -114.631 | |
| csdgm.bounding.east | -108.962 | |
| csdgm.bounding.north | 37.0472 | |
| csdgm.bounding.south | 31.4202 | |
| dc.description.note | Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Under the National Geothermal Data System Supplemental Project Contract DE-EE0002850 | |
| dc.description.collectioninformation | Documents in the AZGS Document Repository collection are made available by the Arizona Geological Survey (AZGS) and the University Libraries at the University of Arizona. For more information about items in this collection, please contact azgs-info@email.arizona.edu. | |
| refterms.dateFOA | 2018-11-10T01:10:40Z |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Utilizing Precipitation and Spring Discharge Data to Identify Groundwater Quick Flow Belts in a Karst Spring CatchmentIn karst terrains, fractures and conduits often occur in clusters, forming groundwater quick flow belts, which are the major passages of groundwater and solute transport. We propose a cost-effective method that utilizes precipitation and spring discharge data to identify groundwater quick flow belts by the multitaper method (MTM). In this paper, hydrological processes were regarded as the transformation of precipitation signals to spring discharge signals in a karst spring catchment. During the processes, karst aquifers played the role of signal filters. Only those signals with high energy could penetrate through aquifers and reflect in the spring discharge, while other weak signals were filtered out or altered by aquifers. Hence, MTM was applied to detect and reconstruct the signals that penetrate through aquifers. Subsequently, by analyzing the reconstructed signals of precipitation with those of spring discharge, we acquired the hydraulic response time and identified the quick flow belts. Finally, the methods were applied to the Niangziguan Spring (NS) catchment, China. Results showed that the hydraulic response time of the spring discharge to precipitation was 3 months at Pingding County; 4 months at Yuxian County, Yangquan City, Xiyang County, and Heshun County; and 27 months at Shouyang County and Zouquan County. These results suggested that Pingding County is located at a groundwater quick flow belt, which is a major passage of groundwater and contaminants, in the NS catchment. This is important since Pingding County is not only the key development area of karst groundwater but also the key conservation area for sustainable development of karst groundwater resources in NS catchment.
-
Influence of Spring, Fall, and Spring-Fall Grazing on Crested Wheatgrass RangeGrazing crested wheatgrass during spring only, fall only, and spring and fall to a 1-inch stubble height for 10 years had little effect on vegetative characteristics of the seeded stands. Invasion of the stands by other species was greater with spring or spring-fall use than with fall use. Litter decreased with all seasonal treatments, but decreased most under spring-fall use. Drought and growing-season moisture were the critical factors in determining forage yields. The spring-fall pastures produced more forage, provided more days of grazing, and gave the highest average beef production, 177 lb/season. Spring grazing was next and fall grazing the least productive for animal weight gains.
