Experiential and cosmopolitan knowledge: The transcontinental field practices of the U.S. Bureau of Biological Survey
Name:
Vetter-SHPSarticle2018.pdf
Size:
168.8Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Author
Vetter, JeremyAffiliation
Univ Arizona, Dept HistIssue Date
2018-08Keywords
Biological surveyLife zone
Field work
Vernon Bailey
Experiential knowledge
Cosmopolitan knowledge
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTDCitation
Vetter, J. (2018). Experiential and cosmopolitan knowledge: The transcontinental field practices of the US Bureau of Biological Survey. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 70, pp. 18-27; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.05.005Rights
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Before many of the global environmental knowledge producing networks and technologies emerged later in the twentieth century, another spatially extended form of field science was implemented at a continental scale by the U.S. Bureau of Biological Survey, revealing similar tensions and dynamics. Specimens and observations from across continental spaces were integrated through railroad-based transportation and communications networks in order to map distributions of birds and mammals and delineate "life zones" stretching across the continent. At the same time that field zoologists of the Biological Survey produced this cosmopolitan scientific knowledge, they also developed an intimate, experiential knowledge of many of the places where they traveled. By following the travels of Biological Survey field parties, especially the agency's long-time chief field naturalist Vernon Bailey, during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries when the railroad was dominant, this paper traces the interconnections between the two ways of knowing in the Biological Survey's practice. However, the integration of these different forms of knowledge was ultimately partial and incomplete, as seen through the Survey's daily practices such as food consumption, the seasonality of survey field practice, and limitations on what types of knowledge were incorporated from lay network collaborators and field assistants. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Note
36 month embargo; published online: 8 June 2018ISSN
00393681PubMed ID
30122250Version
Final accepted manuscriptAdditional Links
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0039368118301377ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.05.005
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
- Authors: Allen D, Rixson L
- Issue date: 2008 Mar
- A Space of One's Own: Barbosa du Bocage, the Foundation of the National Museum of Lisbon, and the Construction of a Career in Zoology (1851-1907).
- Authors: Gamito-Marques D
- Issue date: 2018 Jun
- Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.
- Authors: MacKinnon K, Marcellus L, Rivers J, Gordon C, Ryan M, Butcher D
- Issue date: 2015 Jan
- Laboratory of domesticity: Gender, race, and science at the Bermuda Biological Station for Research, 1903-30.
- Authors: Tonn J
- Issue date: 2019 Jun
- The Carnegie Dietary Survey of Interwar Britain.
- Authors: Shave SA
- Issue date: 2015 Spring