Perceptions of trained laypersons in end-of-life or advance care planning conversations: a qualitative meta-synthesis
Jones, Christine D.
Sanghvi, Urvi Jhaveri
Lum, Hillary D.
AffiliationUniv Arizona, Sarver Heart Ctr, Div Cardiovasc Med
Lay health navigators
Advance care planning
MetadataShow full item record
CitationSomes et al. BMC Palliative Care (2018) 17:98
JournalBMC PALLIATIVE CARE
Rights© The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Collection InformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at email@example.com.
AbstractBackground: Laypersons including volunteers, community health navigators, or peer educators provide important support to individuals with serious illnesses in community or healthcare settings. The experiences of laypersons in communication with seriously ill peers is unknown. Methods: We performed an ENTREQ-guided qualitative meta-synthesis. We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and AMED to include qualitative studies with data regarding communication and laypersons in advance care planning, palliative care, or end-of-life settings. Study quality was appraised using a standardized tool. The analysis identified key domains and associated themes relating specifically to laypersons' perspectives on communication. Results: Of 877 articles, nine studies provided layperson quotations related to layperson-to-peer communication associated with advance care planning (n = 4) or end-of-life conversations (n = 5). The studies were conducted in United Kingdom (n = 4) or United States settings (n = 5). The synthesis of layperson perspectives yielded five main domains: 1) layperson-to-peer communication, focusing on the experience of talking with peers, 2) layperson-topeer interpersonal interactions, focusing on the entire interaction between the layperson and peers, excluding communication-related issues, 3) personal impact on the layperson, 4) layperson contributions, and 5) layperson training. Laypersons described using specific communication skills including the ability to build rapport, discuss sensitive issues, listen and allow silence, and respond to emotions. Conclusions: Published studies described experiences of trained laypersons in conversations with peers related to advance care planning or end-of-life situations. Based on these layperson perspectives related to communication, programs should next evaluate the potential impact of laypersons in meaningful conversations.
NoteOpen access journal.
VersionFinal published version
SponsorsNational Institutes of Health [K76AG054782]; Department of Veterans Affairs
- Development of a Community Advance Care Planning Guides Program and the RELATE Model of Communication.
- Authors: Candrian C, Lasker Hertz S, Matlock D, Flanagan L, Tate C, Kutner JS, Lum HD
- Issue date: 2020 Jan
- A qualitative study of health care professionals' views and experiences of paediatric advance care planning.
- Authors: Jack BA, Mitchell TK, O'Brien MR, Silverio SA, Knighting K
- Issue date: 2018 Jul 13
- Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
- Authors: Busolo D, Woodgate R
- Issue date: 2015 Jan
- Advance care planning, palliative care, and end-of-life care interventions for homeless people: A systematic review.
- Authors: Sumalinog R, Harrington K, Dosani N, Hwang SW
- Issue date: 2017 Feb
- Advance care planning: A systematic review about experiences of patients with a life-threatening or life-limiting illness.
- Authors: Zwakman M, Jabbarian LJ, van Delden J, van der Heide A, Korfage IJ, Pollock K, Rietjens J, Seymour J, Kars MC
- Issue date: 2018 Sep