International Human Rights Law in the Context of Indigenous Peoples: Moving From Legislation to Implementation
AuthorYamada, Erika Magami
AdvisorAnaya, Steven James
Indigenous peoples -- Land tenure
Indigenous peoples -- Land tenure -- Brazil
Indigenous peoples -- Legal status, laws, etc. -- Brazil
Indigenous peoples -- Civil rights -- Brazil
Indigenous peoples -- Government relations
Land tenure -- Government policy
MetadataShow full item record
RightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the James E. Rogers College of Law and the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.
Collection InformationThis item is part of the IPLP Dissertations collection. For more information about the collection or the program, please contact Justin Boro, UA College of Law, firstname.lastname@example.org.
PublisherThe University of Arizona.
AbstractSummary: In Brazil, the right of indigenous peoples to lands has been recognized since colonial time. But recognition of rights on paper has not been followed by implementation and enforcement of those rights. Indigenous peoples are still threatened. The object of present study is the position of Brazilian Federal Supreme Court in regard to regarding indigenous peoples' right to lands and the 144 pending cases. Despite existing constitutional and international laws protecting indigenous peoples' lands, the security of those fundamental rights is still pending confirmation in Brazil. Today, the most relevant suits regarding indigenous peoples' lands usually go to the Federal Supreme Court level because of the conflicting interests between the Union and the federation units (states) and federalism issues. Land rights' cases are not treated as an issue of fundamental rights and or as a matter concerning the State's international human rights obligations. Conflicts over indigenous lands have been framed more as disputes involving the social structure, economic and political interests than an issue of human rights. Therefore, the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court shall confirm its position regarding the interpretation of constitutional article 231 in line with human rights standards and Brazil's international obligations by delivering its final decisions on the pending cases. Generally, there is much resistance to the use of foreign or international instruments as law, even after they become part of the domestic legal order such as the ILO Convention no. 169 in Brazil. That is because allied to the positivist tradition, the Brazilian Federal Constitution is considered to be the highest legal instrument and to comprehensively address fundamental rights. Also, there is a strong belief that the use of international human rights law can threaten State sovereignty and that human rights issues are limited to policy. The Supreme Court has dismissed the use of international human rights law for indigenous land rights cases based on inconsistent arguments, sometimes full of misunderstandings. International human rights standards and instruments are in much more harmony with the Brazilian Federal Constitution than it is stated and can be legitimate tools to overcome colonialism and truly protect indigenous peoples and their culhires through the security of their rights to lands and self-determination. The reservations expressed by the Judiciary regarding the application of human rights standards to indigenous peoples land rights' cases are unfounded, but kept as a scapegoat to serve only the special interests of the elite. This study addresses the following questions: Why should/could the IHRL be used to enforce indigenous peoples' constitutional right to lands at the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court? The main topics of the responses found and developed in the dissertation are: a) international human rights law (IHRL) has evolved to protect indigenous peoples' lands as fundamental rights and have created obligations for the States towards indigenous peoples; b) indigenous land rights' issues are properly the concern of domestic and international institutions and States should be willing to resolve those cases as a matter of human rights; c) the Brazilian legal order allows the use of international human rights law to be directly applied and used as a tool of interpretation of the Constitution because these systems are in harmony; and d) indigenous land rights should be enforced as human rights.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
THE LEFT-TURN OF MULTICULTURALISM: INDIGENOUS AND AFRODESCENDANT SOCIAL MOVEMENTS IN NORTHWESTERN VENEZUELAAlonso, Ana Maria; Ruette, Krisna; Sheridan, Thomas; Greenberg, James; Alonso, Ana Maria (The University of Arizona., 2011)This dissertation explores the impact of multiculturalism on the relationship between ethno-racial social movements and the Venezuelan State. It assesses movements´s capacity to achieve recognition and redistribution within a State embracing anti-neoliberal multicultural discourses and policies.I conducted a comparative ethnographic study of two ethno-racial movements in northwestern Venezuela - the Ayamán-turero indigenous organization located in Lara state and the Afrodescendant movement in Yaracuy state. In order to explain the contemporary variations of these movements´s strategic capacities, I proposed the concept of mobilizing habitii - which I defined as the multilayered dispositions, practices, perceptions, and values orienting social mobilization. I argue that the mobilizing habitii of social organizations can be explored by examining their collective actions frames, strategic actions, and habitual practices. Historical evidence suggests that Ayamán mobilizing habitii have been characterized by strategies of avoidance, while Afroyaracuyan mobilizing dispositions have been shaped by their direct engagement with the State.My comparative research also suggests that Afroyaracuyan people from Veroes have managed to engage in successful territorial struggles, involving effective land redistribution. In contrast, Ayamán people have focused their efforts on reproducing State cultural performances and local ritual practices. However access to material resources, still remains limited for this indigenous population, and almost impossible to achieve through ethno-racial forms of mobilization.My comparative endeavor also shows how the Venezuela multicultural project represents a significant rupture with other Latin American neoliberal multicultural projects. Since 2006, the Venezuelan State has been indigenized, by representing indigenous peoples as the "seeds" and "holders" of the socialist project. The State has institutionalized some indigenous organizations by controlling their resources and by politicizing some leaders. Paradoxically, afrodescendant peoples have remained at the legal margins of this process, facing the ideological barriers of the myths of racial democracy and mestizaje.My conclusions suggest, that ethnic recognition in Bolivarian Venezuela ensures limited redistribution of material resources, while it simultaneously re-essentializes ethno-racial categories and produces new subjectivities. In other words, ethno-racial mobilization is limited for achieving substantial material resources, even in States which are implementing anti-neoliberal multicultural policies.
A Human Rights Paradigm for Indigenous Intellectual PropertyAnaya, Steven James; Schneider, Tobias R. (The University of Arizona., 2009-05)This dissertation investigates the use of established international human rights law in the protection of traditional knowledge. Traditional knowledge is not only deeply embedded in indigenous culture and beliefs, but it is essential to the fabric of indigenous society. However, because of inadequacies in existing Western intellectual property jurisprudence, the current framework of international intellectual property law is insufficient to provide indigenous communities with the safeguards necessary to protect the integrity of their traditional knowledge. Accordingly, a new approach to indigenous intellectual property rights is required, and in my dissertation, I demonstrate how the existing body of international human rights law provides an appropriate mechanism for the protection of traditional knowledge. Indeed, the past decade has seen an increased interest in the protection of indigenous rights and accordingly international institutions and judicial bodies have reinterpreted current human rights law and applied it to situations particular to indigenous peoples. As such, the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights has held that the right to property in international law also applies to indigenous peoples, both individually and collectively. Similarly, the Committee for the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination has held that the lack of consideration for indigenous customary legal systems is discriminatory and against international law and established jurisprudence. Accordingly, the proposed legal framework for this protection is based on the right of selfdetermination and the principle of non-discrimination, as well as existing law specifically protecting indigenous knowledge. I further argue that the application of human rights law to the protection of traditional knowledge is consistent with the expansion in scope of human rights jurisprudence over the past decade.
In the Aftermath of Rampage Shootings: Is Healing Possible? Hard Lessons from the Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians and Other Indigenous PeoplesWilliams, Robert; Diamond, James D.; Miller, Marc; Austin, Raymond (The University of Arizona., 2015-05)This study produces insights, ideas and findings which link mass shootings and communal responses in the United States and on Indian reservations. The study compares and contrasts the aftermath of these tragedies in non-indigenous communities with the responses when the tragedies have occurred in certain American Indian communities. It looks to the roots of the Native American approach in international indigenous historical evidence. The author describes an institutional weakness in the Anglo-European judicial model in how it responds to the aftermath of heinous crimes. He explores adaptation of certain practices from indigenous peoples as a method of contributing to healing, closure and reconciliation following heinous criminal behavior. He further explores the possibility of incorporating face-to-face, interpersonal interaction between mass shooting victims, their families, and offenders and their families.