Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJacknife, Wilma M.
dc.creatorJacknife, Wilma M.
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-11T21:21:18Z
dc.date.available2019-01-11T21:21:18Z
dc.date.issued2013-04
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/631502
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines the state of First Nations self-government in Canada through the lens of the Cornell/Kalt model of nation-building exercised by U.S. Tribes. The research confirms that a sufficient level of de jure and de recto support exists for First Nations in Canada to exercise de facto self-government. The de jure legal support exists in the form of treaties, constitutional recognition and protection treaty and aboriginal rights inclusive of self-government, and political recognition in the form of national policy. The de recto moral support for First Nations selfgovernment exists foremost in the fact that the treaty right of self-government is held by First Nations not by virtue of Crown grant, legislation or treaty, but by reason that they were once independent, self-governing entities in possession of most of the lands now making up Canada. This recognition continues to find expression in First Nations languages, cultures, customs and traditions, and recognition through a variety of legal instruments developed by the United Nations, most recently, the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Lastly, the paper examines the implementation of de fact self-government by Treaty 6 First Nations and the development of a Treaty 6 First Nations Court or Dispute Resolution System. These institutions will draw on principles found in Cree law that relate to way of life, Pimacihowin; good relationships of First Nations with the Creator and with one another, Wahkohtowin; and, Miyo-wicehtowin, the principle of getting along well with others and having good relations where individuals and nations conduct themselves in a manner that creates positive or good relations in all relationships, individually or collective, with other peoples. The features of these institutions will resemble the best precedent in Canada of First Nations threebranch self-government and the Teslin Tlingit First Nations Court.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the James E. Rogers College of Law and the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.en_US
dc.subjectIndigenous peoples -- Canadaen_US
dc.subjectIndians of North America -- Government relationsen_US
dc.subjectSelf-determination, National -- Canadaen_US
dc.subjectNation-building -- Canadaen_US
dc.subjectDispute resolution (Law) -- Canadaen_US
dc.titleA Case for the De Facto Development of Treaty 6 Self-Government First Nations Court and Independent Dispute Resolution Systemen_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typeDissertation-Reproduction (electronic)en_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Lawen_US
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineIndigenous Peoples Law and Policy Programen_US
thesis.degree.nameS.J.D.en_US
dc.description.noteDigitized from a Special Collections copy at the Daniel F. Cracchiolo Law Library, James E. Rogers College of Law, The University of Arizona.en_US
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item is part of the IPLP Dissertations collection. For more information about the collection or the program, please contact Justin Boro, UA College of Law, justinboro1986@email.arizona.edu.
dc.identifier.callnumberLaw Special Collections CRG 14:1:5 2013 J33
thesis.degree.programIndigenous Peoples Law and Policy (IPLP) Program
refterms.dateFOA2018-10-30T00:00:00Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Jacknife_Wilma_M.pdf
Size:
8.184Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Dissertation

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record