A considerable fraction of soil-respired CO2 is not emitted directly to the atmosphere
Name:
s41598-018-29803-x.pdf
Size:
2.103Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published version
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, B2 Earthsci, Biosphere 2Univ Arizona, Sch Geog & Dev
Univ Arizona, Dept Soil Water & Environm Sci
Issue Date
2018-09-10
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
NATURE PUBLISHING GROUPCitation
Sánchez-Cañete, Enrique & Barron-Gafford, Greg & Chorover, Jon. (2018). A considerable fraction of soil-respired CO2 is not emitted directly to the atmosphere. Scientific Reports. 8. 10.1038/s41598-018-29803-x.Journal
SCIENTIFIC REPORTSRights
© The Author(s) 2018. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Soil CO2 efflux (F-soil) is commonly considered equal to soil CO2 production (R-soil), and both terms are used interchangeably. However, a non-negligible fraction of R-soil can be consumed in the subsurface due to a host of disparate, yet simultaneous processes. The ratio between CO2 efflux/O-2 influx, known as the apparent respiratory quotient (ARQ), enables new insights into CO2 losses from R-soil not previously captured by F-soil. We present the first study using continuous ARQ estimates to evaluate annual CO2 losses of carbon produced from R-soil. We found that up to 1/3 of R-soil was emitted directly to the atmosphere, whereas 2/3 of R-soil was removed by subsurface processes. These subsurface losses are attributable to dissolution in water, biological activities and chemical reactions. Having better estimates of R-soil is key to understanding the true influence of ecosystem production on R-soil, as well as the role of soil CO2 production in other connected processes within the critical zone.Note
Open access journal.ISSN
2045-2322PubMed ID
30202073Version
Final published versionSponsors
NSF [1417101, 1331408]; European Commission project DIESEL (FP7-PEOPLE-2013-IOF) [625988]; Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [IJCI-2016-30822]; program "Unidades de Excelencia Cientifica del Plan Propio de Investigacion de la Universidad de Granada"Additional Links
http://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-29803-xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1038/s41598-018-29803-x
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © The Author(s) 2018. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Related articles
- Gap filling strategies and error in estimating annual soil respiration.
- Authors: Gomez-Casanovas N, Anderson-Teixeira K, Zeri M, Bernacchi CJ, DeLucia EH
- Issue date: 2013 Jun
- Quantifying the timescales over which exogenous and endogenous conditions affect soil respiration.
- Authors: Barron-Gafford GA, Cable JM, Bentley LP, Scott RL, Huxman TE, Jenerette GD, Ogle K
- Issue date: 2014 Apr
- Short-term carbon cycling responses of a mature eucalypt woodland to gradual stepwise enrichment of atmospheric CO2 concentration.
- Authors: Drake JE, Macdonald CA, Tjoelker MG, Crous KY, Gimeno TE, Singh BK, Reich PB, Anderson IC, Ellsworth DS
- Issue date: 2016 Jan
- The quandary of sources and sinks of CO2 efflux in tree stems-new insights and future directions.
- Authors: Salomón RL, Helm J, Gessler A, Grams TEE, Hilman B, Muhr J, Steppe K, Wittmann C, Hartmann H
- Issue date: 2024 Feb 6
- Measuring the ratio of CO2 efflux to O2 influx in tree stem respiration.
- Authors: Hilman B, Angert A
- Issue date: 2016 Nov

