Three-dimensional texture analysis of optical coherence tomography images of ovarian tissue
Name:
Sawyer_Texture_Revised.pdf
Size:
4.990Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Coll Opt SciUniv Arizona, Dept Biomed Engn
Issue Date
2018-12
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
IOP PUBLISHING LTDCitation
Travis W Sawyer et al 2018 Phys. Med. Biol. 63 235020Journal
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGYRights
© 2018 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Ovarian cancer has the lowest survival rate among all gynecologic cancers due to predominantly late diagnosis. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has been applied successfully to experimentally image the ovaries in vivo; however, a robust method for analysis is still required to provide quantitative diagnostic information. Recently, texture analysis has proved to be a useful tool for tissue characterization; unfortunately, existing work in the scope of OCT ovarian imaging is limited to only analyzing 2D sub-regions of the image data, discarding information encoded in the full image area, as well as in the depth dimension. Here we address these challenges by testing three implementations of texture analysis for the ability to classify tissue type. First, we test the traditional case of extracted 2D regions of interest; then we extend this to include the entire image area by segmenting the organ from the background. Finally, we conduct a full volumetric analysis of the image volume using 3D segmented data. For each case, we compute features based on the Grey-Level Co-occurence Matrix and also by introducing a new approach that evaluates the frequency distribution in the image by computing the energy density. We test these methods on a mouse model of ovarian cancer to differentiate between age, genotype, and treatment. The results show that the 3D application of texture analysis is most effective for differentiating tissue types, yielding an average classification accuracy of 78.6%. This is followed by the analysis in 2D with the segmented image volume, yielding an average accuracy of 71.5%. Both of these improve on the traditional approach of extracting square regions of interest, which yield an average classification accuracy of 67.7%. Thus, applying texture analysis in 3D with a fully segmented image volume is the most robust approach to quantitatively characterizing ovarian tissue.Note
12 month embargo; published online: 4 December 2018ISSN
1361-6560PubMed ID
30511664Version
Final accepted manuscriptSponsors
National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program [DGE-1143953]; National Institutes of Health under National Cancer Institute [1R01CA195723]; University of Arizona Cancer Center [3P30CA023074]Additional Links
http://stacks.iop.org/0031-9155/63/i=23/a=235020?key=crossref.8ae01ac485d7923e40b71403663d8a5bae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1088/1361-6560/aaefd2
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Evaluation of segmentation algorithms for optical coherence tomography images of ovarian tissue.
- Authors: Sawyer TW, Rice PFS, Sawyer DM, Koevary JW, Barton JK
- Issue date: 2019 Jan
- An overview of optical coherence tomography for ovarian tissue imaging and characterization.
- Authors: Wang T, Brewer M, Zhu Q
- Issue date: 2015 Jan-Feb
- Integrated local binary pattern texture features for classification of breast tissue imaged by optical coherence microscopy.
- Authors: Wan S, Lee HC, Huang X, Xu T, Xu T, Zeng X, Zhang Z, Sheikine Y, Connolly JL, Fujimoto JG, Zhou C
- Issue date: 2017 May
- Visualization and tissue classification of human breast cancer images using ultrahigh-resolution OCT.
- Authors: Yao X, Gan Y, Chang E, Hibshoosh H, Feldman S, Hendon C
- Issue date: 2017 Mar
- Application Values of 2D and 3D Radiomics Models Based on CT Plain Scan in Differentiating Benign from Malignant Ovarian Tumors.
- Authors: Li S, Liu J, Xiong Y, Han Y, Pang P, Luo P, Fan B
- Issue date: 2022