Common Terminology and Acoustic Measures for Human Voice and Birdsong
AffiliationUniv Arizona, Dept Speech Language & Hearing Sci
Univ Arizona, Dept Neurosci
MetadataShow full item record
PublisherAMER SPEECH-LANGUAGE-HEARING ASSOC
CitationBadwal, A., Poertner, J., Samlan, R. A., & Miller, J. E. (2018). Common Terminology and Acoustic Measures for Human Voice and Birdsong. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1-10.
RightsCopyright © 2019 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Collection InformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at email@example.com.
AbstractThe zebra finch is used as a model to study the neural circuitry of auditory-guided human vocal production. The terminology of birdsong production and acoustic analysis, however, differs from human voice production, making it difficult for voice researchers of either species to navigate the literature from the other. The purpose of this research note is to identify common terminology and measures to better compare information across species. Terminology used in the birdsong literature will be mapped onto terminology used in the human voice production literature. Measures typically used to quantify the percepts of pitch, loudness, and quality will be described. Measures common to the literature in both species will be made from the songs of 3 middle-age birds using Praat and Song Analysis Pro. Two measures, cepstral peak prominence (CPP) and Wiener entropy (WE), will be compared to determine if they provide similar information. Similarities and differences in terminology and acoustic analyses are presented. A core set of measures including frequency, frequency variability within a syllable, intensity, CPP, and WE are proposed for future studies. CPP and WE are related yet provide unique information about the syllable structure. Using a core set of measures familiar to both human voice and birdsong researchers, along with both CPP and WE, will allow characterization of similarities and differences among birds. Standard terminology and measures will improve accessibility of the birdsong literature to human voice researchers and vice versa.
VersionFinal accepted manuscript
SponsorsUniversity of Arizona startup funds; University of Arizona Undergraduate Biological Research Program
- A Comparison of Cepstral Peak Prominence Measures From Two Acoustic Analysis Programs.
- Authors: Watts CR, Awan SN, Maryn Y
- Issue date: 2017 May
- Predicting Voice Disorder Status From Smoothed Measures of Cepstral Peak Prominence Using Praat and Analysis of Dysphonia in Speech and Voice (ADSV).
- Authors: Sauder C, Bretl M, Eadie T
- Issue date: 2017 Sep
- Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures.
- Authors: Jannetts S, Lowit A
- Issue date: 2014 Nov
- Use of cepstral analysis for differentiating dysphonic from normal voices in children.
- Authors: Esen Aydinli F, Özcebe E, İncebay Ö
- Issue date: 2019 Jan
- Exploring the relationship between spectral and cepstral measures of voice and the Voice Handicap Index (VHI).
- Authors: Awan SN, Roy N, Cohen SM
- Issue date: 2014 Jul