Ground truth construction and parameter tuning for the detection of sleep spindle timing in rodents
Name:
SpindleMethod_Preprint.pdf
Size:
1.311Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Dept PsycholUniv Arizona, Dept Biomed Engn
Issue Date
2019-02-01
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BVCitation
Harper, B., & Fellous, J. M. (2019). Ground truth construction and parameter tuning for the detection of sleep spindle timing in rodents. Journal of neuroscience methods, 313, 13-23.Journal
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODSRights
© 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
The precise detection of cortical sleep spindles is critical to basic research on memory consolidation in rodents. Previous research using automatic spindle detection algorithms often lacks systematic parameter variations and validations. We present a method to systematically tune and validate algorithm parameters in automatic spindle detection algorithms using a moderate number of human raters. Comparing a Hilbert transform-based algorithm to a ground truth constructed by six human raters, this method produced a parameter set yielding an F1 score of 0.82 at 10 ms resolution. The algorithm performance fell within the range of human agreement with the ground truth. Both human and algorithm failures arose largely from disagreement in spindle boundaries rather than spindle occurrence. With no additional tuning, the algorithm performed similarly in recordings from different days or rats. Most spindle detection algorithms do not perform systematic parameter variations and validation using a ground truth. To our knowledge, our study is the first in which rodent spindle data is scored by humans, and in which an automatic spindle detection algorithm is evaluated with respect to this ground truth. The rodent data from this study make it possible to compare our algorithm with others previously tested on human data.Note
18 month embargo; available online 7 December 2018ISSN
1872-678XPubMed ID
30529457Version
Final accepted manuscriptSponsors
ONR [MURIN000141310672, N000141612829, N000141512838]ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.jneumeth.2018.11.023
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Spindler: a framework for parametric analysis and detection of spindles in EEG with application to sleep spindles.
- Authors: LaRocco J, Franaszczuk PJ, Kerick S, Robbins K
- Issue date: 2018 Dec
- A comparison of two sleep spindle detection methods based on all night averages: individually adjusted vs. fixed frequencies.
- Authors: Ujma PP, Gombos F, Genzel L, Konrad BN, Simor P, Steiger A, Dresler M, Bódizs R
- Issue date: 2015
- Automatic Sleep Spindle Detection and Genetic Influence Estimation Using Continuous Wavelet Transform.
- Authors: Adamczyk M, Genzel L, Dresler M, Steiger A, Friess E
- Issue date: 2015
- Evaluating and Improving Automatic Sleep Spindle Detection by Using Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms.
- Authors: Liu MY, Huang A, Huang NE
- Issue date: 2017
- Sleep Spindles as an Electrographic Element: Description and Automatic Detection Methods.
- Authors: Coppieters 't Wallant D, Maquet P, Phillips C
- Issue date: 2016
