Evaluating implementation supports delivered within problem-solving consultation
Name:
cslkb_Strategies_final.pdf
Size:
629.0Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Publisher
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTDCitation
Collier-Meek, M. A., Sanetti, L. M., Levin, J. R., Kratochwill, T. R., & Boyle, A. M. (2019). Evaluating implementation supports delivered within problem-solving consultation. Journal of School Psychology, 72, 91-111.Journal
JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGYRights
© 2019 Society for the Study of School Psychology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Teachers participating in problem-solving consultation often struggle to maintain adequate treatment fidelity, which is necessary to improve student outcomes. Low levels of treatment fidelity may result from implementation barriers, such as intervention compatibility, implementer skill, and implementer motivation. This study involves the evaluation of five implementation supports designed to address implementation barriers (i.e., Implementation Planning, Role Play, Participant Modeling, Raising Awareness, Motivational Consulting) within problem-solving consultation. Across 14 randomized individual single-case AB intervention designs, we evaluated the impact of these implementation supports on teacher treatment fidelity of classroom management plans and class-wide academic engagement and disruptive behavior. Visual analysis, descriptive statistics, and randomization test analyses suggest that these implementation supports have the potential to be broadly effective in improving teachers' fidelity and student outcomes. Teachers required a different number of supports to increase fidelity levels and rated the implementation supports positively. Implications of the study's findings are described.Note
24 month embargo; published online: 15 January 2019ISSN
1873-3506PubMed ID
30819464Version
Final accepted manuscriptSponsors
Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education [R324A10005]ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.jsp.2018.12.002
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Increasing teacher treatment integrity of behavior support plans through consultation and implementation planning.
- Authors: Hagermoser Sanetti LM, Collier-Meek MA, Long AC, Byron J, Kratochwill TR
- Issue date: 2015 Jun
- Size and consistency of problem-solving consultation outcomes: an empirical analysis.
- Authors: Hurwitz JT, Kratochwill TR, Serlin RC
- Issue date: 2015 Apr
- Evaluation of Daily Physical Activity (DPA) policy implementation in Ontario: surveys of elementary school administrators and teachers.
- Authors: Allison KR, Vu-Nguyen K, Ng B, Schoueri-Mychasiw N, Dwyer JJ, Manson H, Hobin E, Manske S, Robertson J
- Issue date: 2016 Aug 8
- Emailed implementation supports to promote treatment integrity: Comparing the effectiveness and acceptability of prompts and performance feedback.
- Authors: Fallon LM, Collier-Meek MA, Kurtz KD, DeFouw ER
- Issue date: 2018 Jun
- An empirical study of multidimensional fidelity of COMPASS consultation.
- Authors: Wong V, Ruble LA, McGrew JH, Yu Y
- Issue date: 2018 Jun