Name:
2017-parse tree frequency.pdf
Size:
3.531Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Dept Management Informat Syst, Eller Coll ManagementUniv Arizona, Dept Linguist
Issue Date
2017-09
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
WILEYCitation
Kauchak, D., Leroy, G., & Hogue, A. (2017). Measuring text difficulty using parse‐tree frequency. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(9), 2088-2100.Rights
© 2017 ASIS&T.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Text simplification often relies on dated, unproven readability formulas. As an alternative and motivated by the success of term familiarity, we test a complementary measure: grammar familiarity. Grammar familiarity is measured as the frequency of the 3rd level sentence parse tree and is useful for evaluating individual sentences. We created a database of 140K unique 3rd level parse structures by parsing and binning all 5.4M sentences in English Wikipedia. We then calculated the grammar frequencies across the corpus and created 11 frequency bins. We evaluate the measure with a user study and corpus analysis. For the user study, we selected 20 sentences randomly from each bin, controlling for sentence length and term frequency, and recruited 30 readers per sentence (N = 6,600) on Amazon Mechanical Turk. We measured actual difficulty (comprehension) using a Cloze test, perceived difficulty using a 5-point Likert scale, and time taken. Sentences with more frequent grammatical structures, even with very different surface presentations, were easier to understand, perceived as easier, and took less time to read. Outcomes from readability formulas correlated with perceived but not with actual difficulty. Our corpus analysis shows how the metric can be used to understand grammar regularity in a broad range of corpora.Note
12 month embargo; published online 20 June 2017ISSN
23301635Version
Final accepted manuscriptSponsors
National Library of Medicine of the National Institutes of Health [R01LM011975]Additional Links
http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/asi.2017.68.issue-9ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1002/asi.2017.68.issue-9