Accuracy and confidence in perceptions of targets’ attachment to former partners: Do judges vary as a function of individual differences in attachment orientation?
MetadataShow full item record
PublisherACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
CitationBorelli, J. L., Peng, X., Hong, K., Froidevaux, N. M., & Sbarra, D. A. (2019). Accuracy and confidence in perceptions of targets’ attachment to former partners: Do judges vary as a function of individual differences in attachment orientation?. Journal of Research in Personality, 79, 1-12.
Rights© 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Collection InformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
AbstractThis study builds on prior research by examining the degree to which individual differences in judges' attachment orientations predict their accuracy and confidence in rating targets' ongoing attachment to former partners. Targets were recently separated/divorced adults (N = 132) who described their separation experiences. Naive judges (N-study (1) = 93, N-study (2) = 296) read transcripts of targets' separation narratives and rated targets' strength of ongoing attachment to their former partners. Judges' high accuracy did not vary by judges' attachment orientations. However, greater judge avoidance was associated with lower confidence in ratings. Greater attachment anxiety was linked with weaker associations between accuracy and confidence. We discuss findings in terms of their potential implications for partner selection and future studies that can assess this link. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Note24 month embargo; available online 18 January 2019.
VersionFinal accepted manuscript