Teaching About Quality and Safety at Colleges/Schools of Pharmacy in the United States: Exemplars
dc.contributor.advisor | Warholak, Terri | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Cooley, Janet | |
dc.contributor.author | McManus, Katherine | |
dc.contributor.author | Metrejean, Christina | |
dc.contributor.author | Schweitzer, Kali | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-05-03T20:10:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-05-03T20:10:21Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/632197 | |
dc.description | Class of 2018 Abstract | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Specific Aims:. The purpose of this project is to: 1) catalog various methods quality improvement (QI) is being taught in colleges and schools of pharmacy in the United States (US); 2) describe how some colleges/schools of pharmacy are teaching QI; and 3) showcase QI program exemplars. Methods: This descriptive, multi-phase study included an online questionnaire, syllabi review, and semi-structured phone interviews. The study was approved by the University of Arizona Institutional Review Board (IRB). One representative from each Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) accredited or candidate college/school of pharmacy in the US was invited to participate. Participants indicated the type of QI education their college/school provided via online questionnaire. Following questionnaire completion, syllabi were requested and phone interviews were scheduled to obtain additional information. From the data, exemplars were chosen using a pre-determined, evidenced-based rubric. Results: One hundred thirty-six colleges/schools of pharmacy were contacted and 56 colleges/schools (41.2%) completed the survey. Of the responding colleges/schools reporting their QI/safety offerings, 41 (73.2%) reported a required session/module; 24 (42.9%) reported a required course; 21 (37.5%) reported an elective course; 21 (37.5%) reported a clerkship or experiential opportunity; 17 (30.4%) reported a required project; 17 (30.4%) reported interprofessional education integrated into their course; 15 (26.8%) reported an error lab; and 11 (19.6%) reported post-graduate training. Conclusions: Many of the responding US colleges/schools of pharmacy expose students to some aspect of QI/safety, most often via class session or module. The exemplar programs provide examples of how QI can be further integrated into pharmacy curricula. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | The University of Arizona. | en_US |
dc.rights | Copyright © is held by the author. | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | |
dc.subject | quality improvement | en_US |
dc.subject | pharmacy curriculum | en_US |
dc.subject | questionnaire | en_US |
dc.subject | survey | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Quality Improvement | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Curriculum | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Education, Pharmacy | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Surveys and Questionnaires | en_US |
dc.title | Teaching About Quality and Safety at Colleges/Schools of Pharmacy in the United States: Exemplars | en_US |
dc.type | text | en_US |
dc.type | Electronic Report | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | College of Pharmacy, The University of Arizona | en_US |
dc.description.collectioninformation | This item is part of the Pharmacy Student Research Projects collection, made available by the College of Pharmacy and the University Libraries at the University of Arizona. For more information about items in this collection, please contact Jennifer Martin, Librarian and Clinical Instructor, Pharmacy Practice and Science, jenmartin@email.arizona.edu. | en_US |