Revisiting the Integrated Star Formation Law. I. Non-starbursting Galaxies
Name:
de_los_Reyes_2019_ApJ_872_16.pdf
Size:
1.775Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published version
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Dept AstronUniv Arizona, Steward Observ
Issue Date
2019-02-10
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
IOP PUBLISHING LTDCitation
Mithi A. C. de los Reyes and Robert C. Kennicutt Jr. 2019 ApJ 872 16Journal
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNALRights
© 2019. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
We use new and updated gas- and dust-corrected star formation rate (SFR) surface densities to revisit the integrated star formation law for local "quiescent" spiral, dwarf, and low surface brightness galaxies. Using UV-based SFRs with individual IR-based dust corrections, we find that "normal" spiral galaxies alone define a tight Sigma((H I+ H2))-Sigma(SFR) relation described by an n = 1.41(-0).(+0.07)(07) power law with a dispersion of 0.28(-0.02)(+0.02) (errors reflect fitting and statistical uncertainties). The SFR surface densities are only weakly correlated with H I surface densities alone, exhibiting a stronger and roughly linear correlation with H-2 surface densities, similar to what is seen in spatially resolved measurements of disks. However, many dwarf galaxies lie below the star formation law defined by spirals, suggesting a low-density threshold in the integrated star formation law. We consider alternative scaling laws that better describe both spirals and dwarfs. Our improved measurement precision also allows us to determine that much of the scatter in the star formation law is intrinsic, and we search for correlations between this intrinsic scatter and secondary physical parameters. We find that dwarf galaxies exhibit second-order correlations with the total gas fraction, stellar mass surface density, and dynamical time, which may explain much of the scatter in the star formation law. Finally, we discuss various systematic uncertainties that should be kept in mind when interpreting any study of the star formation law, particularly the X(CO) conversion factor and the diameter chosen to define the star-forming disk in a galaxy.ISSN
1538-4357Version
Final published versionSponsors
STFC; Winston Churchill Foundation; NSF Graduate Research Fellowship ProgramAdditional Links
http://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/872/i=1/a=16?key=crossref.b10f112e73db63ffdc0f1cb3f4e44c46ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3847/1538-4357/aafa82
