Name:
Freeman_2019_ApJ_873_102.pdf
Size:
2.123Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published version
Author
Freeman, William R.Siana, Brian
Kriek, Mariska
Shapley, Alice E.
Reddy, Naveen
Coil, Alison L.
Mobasher, Bahram
Muratov, Alexander L.
Azadi, Mojegan
Leung, Gene
Sanders, Ryan
Shivaei, Irene
Price, Sedona H.
DeGroot, Laura
Kereš, Dušan
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Steward ObservIssue Date
2019-03-10Keywords
galaxies: evolutiongalaxies: general
galaxies: high-redshift
galaxies: kinematics and dynamics
galaxies: star formation
stars: winds, outflows
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
IOP PUBLISHING LTDCitation
William R. Freeman et al 2019 ApJ 873 102Journal
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNALRights
© 2019. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
We present results from the MOSFIRE Deep Evolution Field survey on broad flux from the nebular emission lines H alpha, [N II], [O III], H beta, and [S II]. The sample consists of 127 star-forming galaxies at 1.37 < z < 2.61 and 84 galaxies at 2.95 < z < 3.80. We decompose the emission lines using narrow and broad Gaussian components that we define as having FWHM < 275 km s(-1) and FWHM > 300 km s(-1), respectively, for both individual galaxies and stacks. For individual galaxies, broad emission is detected at > 3 sigma in < 10% of galaxies and the broad flux accounts for 10%-70% of the total flux. In the stacks, we find a slight increase in broad to narrow flux ratio with mass but note that we cannot reliably detect broad emission with FWHM < 275 km s(-1), which may be significant at low masses. When placed on the N2-BPT diagram ([O III]/H beta. versus [N II]/H alpha), the broad components of the stacks are shifted toward higher [O III]/H beta. and [N II]/H alpha. ratios compared to the narrow component. We compare the location of the broad components to shock models and find that the broad component could be explained as a shocked outflow, but we do not rule out other possibilities, such as the presence of an AGN. We discuss the possible consequences of shocked emission on the galaxy location in emission line diagnostic diagrams and calculation of SFR. We attempt to estimate the mass outflow rate/star formation rate, but caution that our results strongly rely on the assumptions regarding the physical properties of the outflow.ISSN
1538-4357Version
Final published versionSponsors
NSF AAG [AST-1312780, 1312547, 1312764, 1313171]; NASA through Space Telescope Science Institute [AR-13907]; NASA [NAS 5-26555]; Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellowship; W. M. Keck FoundationAdditional Links
http://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/873/i=2/a=102?key=crossref.735084a9da256107e8f407c56dae3a23ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3847/1538-4357/ab0655
