Evaluating the utility of camera traps in field studies of predation
AuthorAkcali, Christopher K
Adán Pérez-Mendoza, Hibraim
Kikuchi, David W
Guayasamin, Juan M
Pfennig, David W
AffiliationUniv Arizona, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol
Southeastern Coastal Plain
MetadataShow full item record
CitationAkcali CK, Adán Pérez-Mendoza H, Salazar-Valenzuela D, Kikuchi DW, Guayasamin JM, Pfennig DW. 2019. Evaluating the utility of camera traps in field studies of predation. PeerJ 7:e6487 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6487
RightsCopyright © 2019 Akcali et al.
Collection InformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at email@example.com.
AbstractArtificial prey techniques-wherein synthetic replicas of real organisms are placed in natural habitats-are widely used to study predation in the field. We investigated the extent to which videography could provide additional information to such studies. As a part of studies on aposematism and mimicry of coral snakes (Micrurus) and their mimics, observational data from 109 artificial snake prey were collected from video-recording camera traps in three locations in the Americas (terra firme forest, Tiputini Biodiversity Station, Ecuador; premontane wet forest, Nahá Reserve, Mexico; longleaf pine forest, Southeastern Coastal Plain, North Carolina, USA). During 1,536 camera days, a total of 268 observations of 20 putative snake predator species were recorded in the vicinity of artificial prey. Predators were observed to detect artificial prey 52 times, but only 21 attacks were recorded. Mammals were the most commonly recorded group of predators near replicas (243) and were responsible for most detections (48) and attacks (20). There was no difference between avian or mammalian predators in their probability of detecting replicas nor in their probability of attacking replicas after detecting them. Bite and beak marks left on clay replicas registered a higher ratio of avian:mammalian attacks than videos registered. Approximately 61.5% of artificial prey monitored with cameras remained undetected by predators throughout the duration of the experiments. Observational data collected from videos could provide more robust inferences on the relative fitness of different prey phenotypes, predator behavior, and the relative contribution of different predator species to selection on prey. However, we estimate that the level of predator activity necessary for the benefit of additional information that videos provide to be worth their financial costs is achieved in fewer than 20% of published artificial prey studies. Although we suggest future predation studies employing artificial prey to consider using videography as a tool to inspire new, more focused inquiry, the investment in camera traps is unlikely to be worth the expense for most artificial prey studies until the cost:benefit ratio decreases.
NoteOpen access journal
VersionFinal published version
SponsorsAnimal Behavior Society; National Science Foundation ; Reynolds Competitive Research Leave, College of Arts and Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- DIFFERENTIAL AVOIDANCE OF CORAL SNAKE BANDED PATTERNS BY FREE-RANGING AVIAN PREDATORS IN COSTA RICA.
- Authors: Brodie ED 3rd
- Issue date: 1993 Feb
- Zooming in on mechanistic predator-prey ecology: Integrating camera traps with experimental methods to reveal the drivers of ecological interactions.
- Authors: Smith JA, Suraci JP, Hunter JS, Gaynor KM, Keller CB, Palmer MS, Atkins JL, Castañeda I, Cherry MJ, Garvey PM, Huebner SE, Morin DJ, Teckentrup L, Weterings MJA, Beaudrot L
- Issue date: 2020 Sep
- Feeding behavior and venom toxicity of coral snake Micrurus nigrocinctus (Serpentes: Elapidae) on its natural prey in captivity.
- Authors: Urdaneta AH, Bolaños F, Gutiérrez JM
- Issue date: 2004 Aug
- The ethological trap: functional and numerical responses of highly efficient invasive predators driving prey extinctions.
- Authors: Spencer RJ, Van Dyke JU, Thompson MB
- Issue date: 2016 Oct
- Predator cognition permits imperfect coral snake mimicry.
- Authors: Kikuchi DW, Pfennig DW
- Issue date: 2010 Dec