• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • UA Graduate and Undergraduate Research
    • UA Theses and Dissertations
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • UA Graduate and Undergraduate Research
    • UA Theses and Dissertations
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UA Campus RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournal

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutUA Faculty PublicationsUA DissertationsUA Master's ThesesUA Honors ThesesUA PressUA YearbooksUA CatalogsUA Libraries

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Making Sides: Power-Knowledge/Space in the Lyme Wars

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    azu_etd_17112_sip1_m.pdf
    Size:
    2.333Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Davis, Georgia Elizabeth
    Issue Date
    2019
    Keywords
    biopower
    disease
    health
    Lyme disease
    medicine
    power
    Advisor
    Jones, John Paul
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Publisher
    The University of Arizona.
    Rights
    Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.
    Abstract
    Lyme is the most common vector-borne disease in the United States, with more than 300,000 new cases each year. It is geographically contained to the Northeast, Upper Midwest, and northern coastal California. A case of Lyme is easy to recognize, thanks to its characteristic bull’s eye rash, and is curable with up to 4-weeks of antibiotics. At least, that is the generally accepted truth of Lyme disease. A debate has raged for 30-plus years about Lyme’s geography, etiology, symptoms, and treatment. On the one hand is a “mainstream” group of doctors and researchers, whose authority arises from their positions on the editorial boards of major medical journals and from the institutional backing of regulatory agencies, like the FDA and CDC, and professional medical societies, such as the Infectious Diseases Society of America. On the other hand is an organized “alternative” network of patients, their friends and family members, and sympathetic doctors whose political efficacy has been enhanced by counterweight organizations like the Lyme Disease Association and the International Lyme and Associated Diseases Society. The debate has become so acerbic that many observers have called it “the Lyme Wars”. This dissertation examined the conflict. I combined the work of Michel Foucault, Jacques Derrida, and Derek Gregory to construct a Power-Knowledge/Space (P-K/S) theoretical framework with which to critically examine the mainstream discourse describing Lyme and its contentious politics. The P-K/S framework made visible some of the techniques that hierarchically order society and, therefore, allow for the uneven circulation of power. The starting point was space – more specifically the places invoked by the mainstream camp. That meant coding the data for the most frequently invoked places, which included nature, hospitals, clinics, homes, suburbs, and yards. Then, using Derrida, I noted the binary ensembles enrolled in each of these invocations and how they repeated, were reintegrated, and were reworked across different spatial contexts. The final step was an examination of regularities, or the rules that are enacted by these regularly occurring binary ensembles. This process made visible the imaginative geography that is layered onto these spatial invocations and how it both shapes and limits what places can become and, by extension, the kinds of knowledge differently placed subjects can produce. The project found that the mainstream uses a world-as-exhibit imaginary, which constructs the world as if it is a horizontal plane upon which discrete object-bodies and object-spaces are placed. With this imaginary, mainstream medico-scientists are constructed as experts because of their perceived ability to transcend this plane and gaze down upon it to discern the order of nature. This imaginary also constructs the alternative camp as always already situated and, therefore, unable to see the natural order. The result is an uneven hierarchy whereby mainstream knowledge is considered to be absolute truth and competing viewpoints are automatically disqualified as partial and subjective. This project also found that characterizations of the Lyme Wars, as fueled by an alternative camp resisting mainstream science, miss the way the alternative camp was formed through the very processes used to give the mainstream camp its centrality to Lyme science.
    Type
    text
    Electronic Dissertation
    Degree Name
    Ph.D.
    Degree Level
    doctoral
    Degree Program
    Graduate College
    Geography
    Degree Grantor
    University of Arizona
    Collections
    Dissertations

    entitlement

     
    The University of Arizona Libraries | 1510 E. University Blvd. | Tucson, AZ 85721-0055
    Tel 520-621-6442 | repository@u.library.arizona.edu
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.