On the Probabilistic Shaping and Geometric Shaping in Optical Communication Systems
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Dept Elect & Comp EngnIssue Date
2019Keywords
Geometric shapingmutual information
nonlinear distortion
optical fiber communication
probabilistic shaping
quadrature amplitude modulation
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Z. Qu and I. B. Djordjevic, "On the Probabilistic Shaping and Geometric Shaping in Optical Communication Systems," in IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 21454-21464, 2019. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2897381Journal
IEEE ACCESSRights
© 2019 IEEE.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
We introduce and compare typical shaping schemes suitable for optical communications. The geometrically shaped-quadrature amplitude modulation (GS-QAM) formats are characterized by the non-equidistant spacing of constellation points, transmitted uniformly, and applied to improve system capacity. On the other hand, the well-known constant composition distribution matcher (CCDM) is applied for the generation of probabilistically shaped QAM (PS-QAM) formats. Mutual information (MI) is used as a metric to analyze the performances of regular/GS/PS-MQAM formats. In a linear amplified spontaneous emission noise limited region, it can be proved by the numerical simulation that MI performances of the GS-8/16QAM are always better than regular 8/16QAM and PS-8/16QAM; the largest shaping gains can be separately reached by PS-32QAM and GS-32QAM. We continue with the experimental demonstration on the 16QAM-based transmission system, and find that GS-16QAM generally has the best MI performance. We also find that the modulation-dependent nonlinear noises of the GS-8/16/32QAM are comparable to that of the regular 8/16/32QAM and generally lower than PS-8/16/32QAM. By using the enhanced Gaussian noise model, we observe that the GS-8/16QAM formats have better performances than regular 8/16QAM and PS-8/16QAM over multi-span transmission. Meanwhile, PS-32QAM formats provide superior performance over a relatively long transmission distance.Note
Open access journal.ISSN
2169-3536Version
Final published versionSponsors
MURI Program, Office of Naval Research (ONR) [N00014-13-1-0627]Additional Links
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8633909/ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2897381
