• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • UA Graduate and Undergraduate Research
    • UA Theses and Dissertations
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • UA Graduate and Undergraduate Research
    • UA Theses and Dissertations
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UA Campus RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournal

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutUA Faculty PublicationsUA DissertationsUA Master's ThesesUA Honors ThesesUA PressUA YearbooksUA CatalogsUA Libraries

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    The Double Disadvantage: A Theory of Status, Stigma, and Moral Expectations

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    azu_etd_17253_sip1_m.pdf
    Size:
    1.455Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Pfaffendorf, Jessica
    Issue Date
    2019
    Keywords
    Inequality
    Social Psychology
    Status
    Stigma
    Theory
    Advisor
    Stryker, Robin
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Publisher
    The University of Arizona.
    Rights
    Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.
    Embargo
    Release after 05/03/2022
    Abstract
    This dissertation examines how the combined effects of status characteristics and social stigmas diminish outcomes for individuals. Research in the status characteristics theoretical tradition (SCT) has produced leading explanations of how status characteristics like race and gender invoke differential performance expectations that lead to unequal outcomes in the workplace, schools, and other settings. Likewise, various studies illustrate how stigmas such as criminal history and mental illness diminish outcomes in employment, housing, and treatment. Although the processes that lead to disadvantage related to each characteristic have been well researched, there has been no systematic, integrative investigation of how status and stigma might operate in conjunction to intensify disadvantage for individuals – as has been shown to occur in a series of fragmented, case-based studies. This study develops a preliminary theoretical framework to attempt to explain the empirical patterns that suggest this status-stigma intensification effect. Although substantive research suggests that being status-disadvantaged and also stigmatized magnifies bias and discrimination, these patterns are at odds with the literatures most closely associated with status characteristics and stigmas. Drawing on each of these literatures – SCT and theories of stigma – I suggest a new, integrative theory to better link the two concepts and resolve divergences between status and stigma processes. Specifically, this research argues that the moral expectations infused in stigmas will activate low moral expectations associated with devalued states of status characteristics, resulting in the intensification effect. SCT has established that status characteristics invoke performance expectations, which influence outcomes. Moral expectations, however, have not yet been considered within the theory. I explore this relationship in two experiments designed to test the potential status-stigma interaction and the mediating effects of moral and performance expectations using participant evaluations within a mock-hiring scenario across two cases: race/criminal history and gender/mental illness. Results from the two experiments provide preliminary support for a general status-stigma interaction effect. Further, results provide support for the mediating role of moral expectations in the relationship between the status-stigma interaction and workplace outcomes. That is – for both race/criminal history and gender/mental illness – I find that having a devalued status state and a stigma results in more negative work-related evaluations and outcomes and that these evaluations are mediated by moral expectations. Contrary to my predictions and to central tenets of SCT, however, there are no status effects of either race or gender in the absence of stigma, and performance expectations do not mediate the status-stigma interaction on workplace outcomes. These findings lay the foundation for a synthetic theory that resolves certain divergences between status and stigma processes. In particular, there is compelling preliminary evidence for two new theoretical tenets that may guide the aggregation of status and stigmatized characteristics: a general interaction effect and the mediating role of moral expectations. As this study identifies moral expectations as a new mechanism of status and stigma-related bias, it also suggests fruitful new avenues for targeted interventionist efforts to reduce discrimination. However, this study should be viewed as a first step in the exploration of concerns that span the status and stigma literatures. More general conclusions about the applicability and scope of the framework developed here will depend on future research that examines additional sets of characteristics.
    Type
    text
    Electronic Dissertation
    Degree Name
    Ph.D.
    Degree Level
    doctoral
    Degree Program
    Graduate College
    Sociology
    Degree Grantor
    University of Arizona
    Collections
    Dissertations

    entitlement

     
    The University of Arizona Libraries | 1510 E. University Blvd. | Tucson, AZ 85721-0055
    Tel 520-621-6442 | repository@u.library.arizona.edu
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.