We are upgrading the repository! We will continue our upgrade in February 2025 - we have taken a break from the upgrade to open some collections for end-of-semester submission. The MS-GIST Master's Reports, SBE Senior Capstones, IPLP dissertations, and UA Faculty Publications collections are currently open for submission. Please reach out to repository@u.library.arizona.edu with your questions, or if you are a UA affiliate who needs to make content available in another collection.
Fund Development and Donor Race: How Colorblindness and a ‘Sales Mentality’ Delimits Expanding the Donor Base
Author
Jensen-Ives, Johanne KirstenIssue Date
2019Advisor
Rhoades, Gary D.
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
The University of Arizona.Rights
Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.Abstract
This qualitative case study examined the practices used by higher education development professionals and institutions to better understand how a donor’s race is considered as part of the fundraising process. It employed a Critical Race Theory (CRT) framework (Delgado, 2001) designed to combine the scholarship on fund development and race. The central frames of color-blind racism (Bonilla-Silva, 2006) were key organizing concepts for the analysis of findings in this study. Additionally, this research used concepts of White savior ideology (Cammarota, 2011) and poverty porn (Collin, 2009) to interpret the messages and language used in the higher education development field. To provide context for this study, the concept of academic capitalism (Slaughter & Rhoades, 2004) is engaged relative to the pressure higher education development professionals may experience connected to their fundraising efforts. This study employed several qualitative methods for gathering data which consisted of interviews, document analysis, and observation. Findings revealed that development officers utilized a colorblind approach or a one size fits all method for their fundraising, which maps on to several of the four central frames of color-blind racism (Bonilla- Silva, 2006). The findings from this study also suggest that the growing ‘sales mentality’ and pressure to generate more revenue for big campaigns is fueling a development environment where fundraisers are being conditioned to desire a donor who is White and familiar with the philanthropic process; therefore not taking up too much of their time. Institutional, practical, and research-oriented recommendations and implications are presented to inform the work of higher education advancement professionals. This research contributes to the scholarship in CRT, but also provides new empirical based scholarship on a topic that was previously unexplored between higher education fundraising and race.Type
textElectronic Dissertation
Degree Name
Ph.D.Degree Level
doctoralDegree Program
Graduate CollegeHigher Education