Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) Students’ Opinions of the Pharmacy Curriculum Outcomes Assessment Exam (PCOA) at one College of Pharmacy
AffiliationCollege of Pharmacy, The University of Arizona
Education, Pharmacy, Graduate
MetadataShow full item record
RightsCopyright © is held by the author.
Collection InformationThis item is part of the Pharmacy Student Research Projects collection, made available by the College of Pharmacy and the University Libraries at the University of Arizona. For more information about items in this collection, please contact Jennifer Martin, Associate Librarian and Clinical Instructor, Pharmacy Practice and Science, firstname.lastname@example.org.
PublisherThe University of Arizona.
AbstractSpecific Aims: Compare student’s opinions and get an overall understanding of which classes the student’s feel the College of Pharmacy can emphasize to better prepare them in their didactic course work. Subjects: Pharmacy students of the University of Arizona class of 2019 at the Tucson campus in Arizona. Methods: Students who had recently taken the Pharmacy Curriculum Outcomes Assessment Exam (PCOA) at one College of Pharmacy self-assessed their knowledge in each of the core subjects; pharmacology, management, statistics, medicinal chemistry, and clinical pharmacology, covered by the PCOA exam using a questionnaire. The questionnaires were administered during a regularly scheduled class and collected after completion. Data were analyzed using excel spreadsheets and nonparametric procedures for nominal and ordinal level data. Main Results: The response rate was 75%. The average age and Grade Point Average (GPA) of study respondents was 23 (SD= 8.354) and 3.28 (SD=0.9608) respectively. Out of the 5 core areas, medicinal chemistry was rated as the toughest section on the PCOA exam. Furthermore, more than 60% of the students indicated that they struggled with at least 2 classes from the core areas. Overall, many students agreed the level of difficulty on the exam was appropriate, helped identify the topics to review and the review session provided by the school was not adequate to help them excel on the exam. Conclusions The results suggest the PCOA exam helped identify the core classes in the curriculum that each student needs to review. Despite a great portion of the students struggling with at least 2 or more classes, the PCOA can be used as a tool to help both students and faculty members identify weaknesses.
DescriptionClass of 2018 Abstract
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Strategic planning by institutional pharmacy administratorsBootman, J. Lyle; Harrison, Donald Lee, 1956- (The University of Arizona., 1990)The extent and quality of strategic planning by institutional pharmacy directors was assessed. Also examined was how the extent and quality of strategic planning, institutional characteristics, pharmacy characteristics, and pharmacy director characteristics might be associated with the pharmacy's overall level of performance in selected areas. The majority of institutional pharmacy directors reported utilizing strategic planning for their departments. The global quality of strategic planning reported by pharmacy directors was average. However, directors conducting strategic planning reported a high level of strategic planning. The directors' rated time available, knowledge, and importance of strategic planning were found to be significantly associated with pharmacy directors' rated quality of strategic planning. Additionally, pharmacy directors' rated quality of strategic planning was found to be significantly associated with pharmacy performance for clinical, distributive, and administrative services.