Assessment Literacy: A Study of EFL Teachers’ Assessment Knowledge, Perspectives, and Classroom Behaviors
AuthorAl Bahlani, Sara Mohammed
ESL/ EFL Assessment
Language Assessment practices
Teacher Training on Assessment
MetadataShow full item record
PublisherThe University of Arizona.
RightsCopyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.
EmbargoRelease after 12/01/2019
AbstractTeacher assessment literacy is essential to the success of teaching (T. H. Wang et al., 2008), the quality of student learning (DeLuca, Klinger, Searle, & Shulha, 2010; Mertler, 2004; White, 2009) and student learning motivation (Alkharusi, 2013; Dorman & Knightley, 2006). However, studies have consistently shown inadequate levels of assessment literacy for both pre-service and in-service teachers in language teaching and general education (Alkharusi, 2011; Malone, 2013; Mertler & Campbel1, 2005; Plake & Impara, 1992). This dissertation research aims to understand the current state of EFL teacher assessment literacy in six colleges of applied sciences in Oman by investigating teacher self-perceived language assessment literacy (competence and frequency of practice) as well as assessment knowledge and practice in the classroom. Its theoretical framework are Brookhart’s (2011) contemporary conceptualizations of formative assessment, Eyal’s (2012) discussion of digital assessment literacy as an important component in measuring teacher assessment literacy and Alkharusi’s (2009; 2010) methodological approach to investigating assessment literacy. This study implements a mixed-method approach using a triangulation of five data sources including self-assessment surveys, a language assessment knowledge test, an assessment evaluation task, classroom observations with a focus on teacher-produced assessment tasks, and teacher interviews. Multivariate analyses were used to examine relations between assessment literacy and participant background characteristics, such as gender, academic preparation, teaching experience, experience as coordinators, pre-service training, and in-service training. Research findings point to strengths and weaknesses in EFL teacher assessment literacy as well as matches and mismatches between teachers’ self-perceived assessment literacy and demonstrated assessment knowledge. Overall EFL teachers view themselves as moderately competent in language assessment. The variable with the strongest effect on teacher’s assessment literacy was pre-service training in assessment. The study discusses implications of research findings and offers suggestions for EFL teacher preparation programs, teaching institutions, and future research.
Degree ProgramGraduate College
Second Language Acquisition & Teaching
Degree GrantorUniversity of Arizona
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
A Needs Assessment Regarding a Fire Risk Assessment Checklist In the Operating RoomPiotrowski, Kathleen A.; Aram, Margie Huna; Torabi, Sarah; Henker, Richard (The University of Arizona., 2018)Background: A surgical fire in the operating room (OR) is a devastating hazard that carries the weight of high morbidity and mortality. Through acknowledgment of fire risks among all OR team members, proper education, and training, as well as effective communication, a surgical fire in the OR is a preventable medical error. The addition of a fire risk assessment (FRA) checklist has been proven to increase awareness of potential fire risks and improve the quality and safety of patient care. Purpose: The purpose of this project was to perform a needs assessment regarding surgical team members’ knowledge, awareness, and utilization rate of FRA checklist as a precautionary measure to prevent surgical fires. Moreover, this project attempted to gather data concerning potential barriers towards the implementation and adoption of the FRA checklist to the already established surgical timeout prior to every procedure being performed. Setting: This project took place at a Level 1 trauma hospital in the greater Phoenix, Arizona metro area. The study included (N=16) participants, who were the members of the surgical team at this organization. Method: An online survey was disseminated to participants. The survey consisted of two sections which examine 1) sociodemographic information, and 2) assessment of knowledge, practice, and attitudes related to FRA checklist during the surgical timeout. Results: Majority of the respondents acknowledged that FRA is an appropriate tool and is necessary during the surgical timeout. Only 25% (N=16) of respondents acknowledged reviewing this current practice guideline on FRA checklist. The most important finding from this study is that half of the respondents (N=8) supported on the usefulness of the FRA checklist during the surgical timeout in their current clinical practice setting. Furthermore, 69% (N=11) of the participants agreed this gap exists in their current practice related to FRA checklist during the surgical timeout. Conclusion: By surveying the surgical team members’ knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions, the researcher identified gaps in current practice. These findings were then used to determine the need for the FRA checklist during the surgical timeout at this healthcare organization. This Facility implemented a protocol for the FRA checklist effective February 7, 2018.
American Indian Transportation Committee Field Assessment of Cultural Sites Regarding the U.S. Department of Energy Pre-Approval Draft Environmental Assessment of Intermodal Transportation of Low-Level Radioactive Waste to the Nevada Test Site.Arnold, Richard; Booth, Elliot; Cornelius, Betty; Eddy, Larry; Hooper, Milton; Howard, Ted; Myers, Calvin; Moose, Gaylene; Stoffle, Richard, W.; Toupal, Rebecca; et al. (Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology, University of Arizona, 1999-02-08)
Evaluating Knowledge to Support Climate Action: A Framework for Sustained Assessment. Report of an Independent Advisory Committee on Applied Climate AssessmentMoss, R. H.; Avery, S.; Baja, K.; Burkett, M.; Chischilly, A. M.; Dell, J.; Fleming, P. A.; Geil, K.; Jacobs, K.; Jones, A.; et al. (AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC, 2019-07)As states, cities, tribes, and private interests cope with climate damages and seek to increase preparedness and resilience, they will need to navigate myriad choices and options available to them. Making these choices in ways that identify pathways for climate action that support their development objectives will require constructive public dialogue, community participation, and flexible and ongoing access to science- and experience-based knowledge. In 2016, a Federal Advisory Committee (FAC) was convened to recommend how to conduct a sustained National Climate Assessment (NCA) to increase the relevance and usability of assessments for informing action. The FAC was disbanded in 2017, but members and additional experts reconvened to complete the report that is presented here. A key recommendation is establishing a new nonfederal "climate assessment consortium" to increase the role of state/local/tribal government and civil society in assessments. The expanded process would 1) focus on applied problems faced by practitioners, 2) organize sustained partnerships for collaborative learning across similar projects and case studies to identify effective tested practices, and 3) assess and improve knowledge-based methods for project implementation. Specific recommendations include evaluating climate models and data using user-defined metrics; improving benefit-cost assessment and supporting decision-making under uncertainty; and accelerating application of tools and methods such as citizen science, artificial intelligence, indicators, and geospatial analysis. The recommendations are the result of broad consultation and present an ambitious agenda for federal agencies, state/local/tribal jurisdictions, universities and the research sector, professional associations, nongovernmental and community-based organizations, and private-sector firms.