The Jazziness of Local Food Practice Work: Organization-Level Ingenuity and the Entrepreneurial Formation and Evolution of Local Food Systems
Name:
Practice_work_ingenuity_LFS_Fi ...
Size:
314.5Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Dept Agr Leadership & InnovatUniv Arizona, Dept Mkt
Issue Date
2019-06
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
WILEYCitation
Mars, M. M. and Schau, H. J. (2019), The Jazziness of Local Food Practice Work: Organization‐Level Ingenuity and the Entrepreneurial Formation and Evolution of Local Food Systems. Rural Sociology, 84: 257-283. doi:10.1111/ruso.12244Journal
RURAL SOCIOLOGYRights
© 2018 by the Rural Sociological Society.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Local food systems (LFSs) are complex and diverse social structures. The processes that influence the formation and evolution of LFSs are obscure, relatively uncoordinated, and somewhat mysterious. This study develops a stronger understanding of such processes through a qualitative exploration of the influence of routine practice work at the organization level on the entrepreneurial development of two distinct LFSs in the Southwest region of the United States: southeastern Arizona and Albuquerque-Santa Fe. We gathered data between August 2014 and September 2017 through semistructured interviews with and direct observations of 53 local food practitioners operating in one of the two LFSs. Theoretical principles of institutional entrepreneurship, embedded agency, and practice work guided the study. The findings reveal three forms of ingenuity (technological, organizational, policy) that regularly emerge through the day-to-day organization-level work of local food practitioners. We argue that the system-level influence of these forms, whether intentional or not, are indicators of the embedded agency of the practitioners and their capacities to serve as institutional entrepreneurs. We discuss implications for both practice and future research.Note
12 month embargo; published online: 23 September 2018ISSN
0036-01121549-0831
Version
Final accepted manuscriptAdditional Links
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/15490831/84/2ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1111/ruso.2019.84.issue-2