• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • UA Graduate and Undergraduate Research
    • College of Medicine - Phoenix, Scholarly Projects
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • UA Graduate and Undergraduate Research
    • College of Medicine - Phoenix, Scholarly Projects
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UA Campus RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournal

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutUA Faculty PublicationsUA DissertationsUA Master's ThesesUA Honors ThesesUA PressUA YearbooksUA CatalogsUA Libraries

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Implicit Bias Toward Cervical Cancer: Provider and Training Differences

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    SP_2019_Liang_Thesis.pdf
    Size:
    372.9Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    SP_2019_Liang_Poster.pdf
    Size:
    647.2Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Liang, Juliana
    Affiliation
    The University of Arizona College of Medicine – Phoenix
    Issue Date
    2019
    Keywords
    Obstetrics & Gynecology
    Implicit Bias
    Physicians
    MeSH Subjects
    Gynecology
    Oncology
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Publisher
    The University of Arizona.
    Description
    A Thesis submitted to The University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Medicine.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10150/633439
    Abstract
    Implicit prejudice and stereotyping may exist in health care providers automatically without their awareness. These biases often correlate with outcomes that are consequential for the patient. This study examined gynecologic oncology care providers' implicit prejudice and stereotyping toward cervical cancer. Members of professional gynecologic oncology organizations were asked to complete two Implicit Association Tests (IAT) to determine if they implicitly associate cervical cancer with feelings of anger (prejudice) or beliefs about culpability for the disease (stereotypes), compared to ovarian cancer. Linear regression models and Student t-tests examined average levels of implicit bias and moderators of the implicit bias effects. One-hundred seventy-six (132 female, 43 male, 1 nonresponse; mean age = 39.18 years, SD age = 10.58 years) providers were recruited and the final sample included 151 participants (93 physicians and 58 nurses, mean age=38.93, SD age=10.59). Gynecologic oncology providers showed significant levels of implicit prejudice, X = 0.17, SD = 0.47, 95% CI: (0.10, 0.25), toward cervical cancer patients. They also showed significant levels of implicit stereotyping of cervical cancer patients, X=0.15, SD=0.42, 95% CI: (0.08, 0.21). Whereas physicians did not demonstrate significant levels of implicit bias, nurses demonstrated greater levels of implicit prejudice and implicit stereotyping. Providers without cultural competency training or implicit bias training demonstrated greater implicit bias than those who had completed such training (p < .05). This study provides the first evidence that gynecologic oncology providers hold implicit biases related to cervical cancer. Interventions designed to target specific groups in gynecologic oncology may help improve interactions with patients.
    Type
    text
    Electronic Thesis
    Language
    en
    Collections
    College of Medicine - Phoenix, Scholarly Projects

    entitlement

     
    The University of Arizona Libraries | 1510 E. University Blvd. | Tucson, AZ 85721-0055
    Tel 520-621-6442 | repository@u.library.arizona.edu
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.