Circular collimator arc versus dynamic conformal arc treatment planning for linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery of an intracranial small single lesion: a perspective of lesion asymmetry
AffiliationUniv Arizona, Dept Radiat Oncol
Circular collimator arcs
Dynamic conformal arcs
Linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery
MetadataShow full item record
CitationLee, Y. C., & Kim, Y. (2019). Circular collimator arc versus dynamic conformal arc treatment planning for linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery of an intracranial small single lesion: a perspective of lesion asymmetry. Radiation Oncology, 14(1), 91.
Rights© The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Collection InformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
AbstractBackground: Although circular collimator arcs (CCA) and dynamic conformal arcs (DCA) are commonly used linear accelerator-based treatment planning techniques for intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of a small single lesion, these two techniques have not been rigorously compared in terms of tumor shape. Therefore, this study compared clinical CCA plans with re-planned DCA plans using conformity index (CI) and V12Gy (volume of normal brain tissue receiving 12 Gy or higher) from a perspective of asymmetry (Asym) of planning target volume (PTV). Methods: Ninety-five clinical CCA plans delivered for a small single lesion with PTV size < 1.4 cm3 were selected and re-planned using DCA. PTV Asym (%) was defined and calculated from three dimensions of PTV. A pair of the 95 plans was first considered as one group without grouping and then categorized into two groups with respective to either PTV size or PTV Asym, and four groups with respect to PTV size and PTV Asym. For grouping, median values of PTV size and PTV Asym were used. A non-parametric paired test was performed for CI and V12Gy to compare CCA and DCA plans in each group. Results: Median values of PTV size and PTV Asym were 0.415 cm3 (range: 0.076 cm3–1.369 cm3) and 6.12% (range: 0.52–25.74%), respectively. DCA plans had a lower average CI value than CCA plans for all groups. CCA plans had a smaller average V12Gy value than DCA plans for lesions with PTV Asym ≤6.12%, while CCA and DCA plans had similar average V12Gy values for lesions with PTV Asym > 6.12%. Conclusions: The DCA technique is recommended when a lesion has PTV Asym > 6.12% regardless of PTV size. For lesions with PTV Asym ≤6.12%, a technique choice would depend on the preference of CI or V12Gy.
NoteOpen access journal
VersionFinal published version
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Is high-dose rate RapidArc-based radiosurgery dosimetrically advantageous for the treatment of intracranial tumors?
- Authors: Zhao B, Yang Y, Li X, Li T, Heron DE, Saiful Huq M
- Issue date: 2015 Spring
- Improvement of conformal arc plans by using deformable margin delineation method for stereotactic lung radiotherapy.
- Authors: Güngör G, Demir M, Aydın G, Yapıcı B, Atalar B, Özyar E
- Issue date: 2018 Jan
- Radiosurgery treatment planning using conformal arc informed volumetric modulated arc therapy.
- Authors: Giles WM, Cullom ET, Laryea OA, Nobah A, Alves VGL, Yin FF, Kirkpatrick JP, Adamson JD
- Issue date: 2021 Spring
- Dosimetric feasibility of brain stereotactic radiosurgery with a 0.35 T MRI-guided linac and comparison vs a C-arm-mounted linac.
- Authors: Slagowski JM, Redler G, Malin MJ, Cammin J, Lobb EC, Lee BH, Sethi A, Roeske JC, Flores-Martinez E, Stevens T, Yenice KM, Green O, Mutic S, Aydogan B
- Issue date: 2020 Nov
- Retrospective quality metrics review of stereotactic radiosurgery plans treating multiple targets using single-isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy.
- Authors: Cui Y, Gao H, Zhang J, Kirkpatrick JP, Yin FF
- Issue date: 2020 Jun