One Swallow Does Not Make a Summer: Siloes, Trade-Offs and Synergies in the Water-Energy-Food Nexus
Author
Kurian, MathewScott, Christopher
Reddy, V. Ratna
Alabaster, Graham
Nardocci, Adelaide
Portney, Kent
Boer, Rizaldi
Hannibal, Bryce
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Udall Ctr Studies Publ PolicyIssue Date
2019-03-21Keywords
Water-Energy-Food NexusSustainable Development Goals
trade-offs
siloes
synergies
agent-based modeling
Wastewater Reuse Effectiveness Index
place-based observatories
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
FRONTIERS MEDIA SACitation
Kurian M, Scott C, Reddy VR, Alabaster G, Nardocci A, Portney K, Boer R and Hannibal B (2019) One Swallow Does Not Make a Summer: Siloes, Trade-Offs and Synergies in the Water-Energy-Food Nexus. Front. Environ. Sci. 7:32. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2019.00032Rights
© 2019 Kurian, Scott, Reddy, Alabaster, Nardocci, Portney, Boer and Hannibal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Synergies are required to ensure coordination between UN agencies (on norms and indicators), Member States (on coherence of policy instruments) and consumers (on perceptions of safety and affordability of services) to advance the achievement of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) target 6.3 which focusses on reuse of wastewater. In this paper we employ theoretical insights derived from an agent-based modeling approach to undertake a critical examination of the recent UN-WATER directive on SDG target 6.3 and advocate for an improved understanding of factors that determine whether and how effective wastewater reuse will be possible while accommodating for regional variation and institutional change. We demonstrate that by applying the Nexus approach it is feasible to overcome siloes by forging concepts of trade-offs and synergies to draw out coupled perspectives of bio-physical and institutional dimensions of water-energy-food interactions. By employing this proposition, the paper advocates for place-based observatories as a mechanism that can support valorization of data and methodological assumptions as a precursor to robust monitoring of the SDG's. The systematic use of literature reviews and expert opinion to develop and pilot-test composite indices via place-based observatories raises the prospect of a data light approach to monitoring SDGs; specifically, what are the merits of relying on extensive survey data compared to composite indices that while being amenable to supporting benchmarking and scenario analysis can provide the insight needed to inform decision-making and robust monitoring of global goals?Note
Open access journalISSN
2296-665XVersion
Final published versionSponsors
UNU-FLORES, Dresden, Germany [2389, 9371]Additional Links
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00032/fullae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3389/fenvs.2019.00032
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2019 Kurian, Scott, Reddy, Alabaster, Nardocci, Portney, Boer and Hannibal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).