Nucleon axial, scalar, and tensor charges using lattice QCD at the physical pion mass
Name:
PhysRevD.99.114505.pdf
Size:
1.270Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Author
Hasan, NesreenGreen, Jeremy
Meinel, Stefan
Engelhardt, Michael
Krieg, Stefan
Negele, John
Pochinsky, Andrew
Syritsyn, Sergey
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Dept PhysIssue Date
2019-06-19
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
American Physical Society (APS)Citation
Hasan, N., Green, J., Meinel, S., Engelhardt, M., Krieg, S., Negele, J., ... & Syritsyn, S. (2019). Nucleon axial, scalar, and tensor charges using lattice QCD at the physical pion mass. Physical Review D, 99(11), 114505.Journal
Physical Review DRights
Copyright © The Author(s). Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
We report on lattice QCD calculations of the nucleon isovector axial, scalar, and tensor charges. Our calculations are performed on two 2 + 1-flavor ensembles generated using a 2-HEX-smeared Wilson-clover action at the physical pion mass and lattice spacings a approximate to 0.116 and 0.093 fm. We use a wide range of source-sink separations-eight values ranging from roughly 0.4 to 1.4 fm on the coarse ensemble and three values from 0.9 to 1.5 fm on the fine ensemble-which allows us to perform an extensive study of excited-state effects using different analysis and fit strategies. To determine the renormalization factors, we use the nonperturbative Rome-Southampton approach and compare RI'-MOM and RI-SMOM intermediate schemes to estimate the systematic uncertainties. Our final results are computed in the (MS) over bar scheme at scale 2 GeV. The tensor and axial charges have uncertainties of roughly 4%, g(T) = 0.972(41) and g(A) = 1.265(49). The resulting scalar charge, g(S) = 0.927(303), has a much larger uncertainty due to a stronger dependence on the choice of intermediate renormalization scheme and on the lattice spacing.ISSN
2470-0010Version
Final published versionSponsors
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics [DE-SC0009913]; RIKEN BNL Research Center; Office of Nuclear Physics of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-96ER40965, DE-SC-0011090, DE-FC02-06ER41444]; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB-TRR 55]; University of Arizona; Stony Brook Universityae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1103/physrevd.99.114505
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © The Author(s). Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

