AuthorMorales, Miguel F
AffiliationUniv Arizona, Sch Earth & Space Explorat
MetadataShow full item record
PublisherOXFORD UNIV PRESS
CitationMiguel F Morales, Adam Beardsley, Jonathan Pober, Nichole Barry, Bryna Hazelton, Daniel Jacobs, Ian Sullivan, Understanding the diversity of 21 cm cosmology analyses, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 483, Issue 2, February 2019, Pages 2207–2216, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2844
Rights© 2018 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society.
Collection InformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Abstract21 cm power spectrum observations have the potential to revolutionize our understanding of the epoch of reionization and dark energy, but require extraordinarily precise data analysis methods to separate the cosmological signal from the astrophysical and instrumental contaminants. This analysis challenge has led to a diversity of proposed analyses, including delay spectra, imaging power spectra, m-mode analysis, and numerous others. This diversity of approach is a strength, but has also led to a confusion within the community about whether insights gleaned by one group are applicable to teams working in different analysis frameworks. In this paper, we show that all existing analysis proposals can be classified into two distinct families based on whether they estimate the power spectrum of the measured or reconstructed sky. This subtle difference in the statistical question posed largely determines the susceptibility of the analyses to foreground emission and calibration errors, and ultimately the science different analyses can pursue. In this paper, we detail the origin of the two analysis families, categorize the analyses being actively developed, and explore their relative sensitivities to foreground contamination and calibration errors.
VersionFinal published version
SponsorsNational Science Foundation (NSF) [1613855, 1613040, 1506024, 1636646]; National Aeronautivcal and Space Administration [80NSSC18K0389]; NSF Astronomy and Astrophysics Postdoctoral Fellowship