Consistency of cosmic microwave background temperature measurements in three frequency bands in the 2500-square-degree SPT-SZ survey
Author
Mocanu, L.M.Crawford, T.M.
Aylor, K.
Benson, B.A.
Bleem, L.E.
Carlstrom, J.E.
Chang, C.L.
Cho, H.-M.
Chown, R.
Crites, A.T.
de Haan, T.
Dobbs, M.A.
Everett, W.B.
George, E.M.
Halverson, N.W.
Harrington, N.L.
Henning, J.W.
Holder, G.P.
Holzapfel, W.L.
Hou, Z.
Hrubes, J.D.
Knox, L.
Lee, A.T.
Luong-Van, D.
Marrone, D.P.
McMahon, J.J.
Meyer, S.S.
Millea, M.
Mohr, J.J.
Natoli, T.
Omori, Y.
Padin, S.
Pryke, C.
Reichardt, C.L.
Ruhl, J.E.
Sayre, J.T.
Schaffer, K.K.
Shirokoff, E.
Staniszewski, Z.
Stark, A.A.
Story, K.T.
Vanderlinde, K.
Vieira, J.D.
Williamson, R.
Wu, W.L.K.
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Steward ObservIssue Date
2019-07
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
IOP PUBLISHING LTDCitation
L.M. Mocanu et al JCAP07(2019)038Rights
© 2019 IOP Publishing Ltd and Sissa Medialab.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
We present an internal consistency test of South Pole Telescope (SPT) measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature anisotropy using three-band data from the SPT-SZ survey. These measurements are made from observations of similar to 2500 deg(2) of sky in three frequency bands centered at 95, 150, and 220 GHz. We combine the information from these three bands into six semi-independent estimates of the CMB power spectrum (three single-frequency power spectra and three cross-frequency spectra) over the multipole range 650 < l < 3000. We subtract an estimate of foreground power from each power spectrum and evaluate the consistency among the resulting CMB-only spectra. We determine that the six foreground-cleaned power spectra are consistent with the null hypothesis, in which the six cleaned spectra contain only CMB power and noise. A fit of the data to this model results in a chi(2) value of 236.3 for 235 degrees of freedom, and the probability to exceed this chi(2) value is 46%.Note
12 month embargo; published online: 24 July 2019ISSN
1475-7516Version
Final accepted manuscriptSponsors
National Science Foundation [PLR-1248097]; NSF Physics Frontier Center [PHY-0114422]; Kavli Foundation; Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation [947]; Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]; Open Science Grid, NSF [NSF PHY 1148698]; Australian Research Council's Future Fellowship [FT150100074]; NASA Office of Space Scienceae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1088/1475-7516/2019/07/038