Evaluating Knowledge to Support Climate Action: A Framework for Sustained Assessment. Report of an Independent Advisory Committee on Applied Climate Assessment
Author
Moss, R. H.Avery, S.
Baja, K.
Burkett, M.
Chischilly, A. M.
Dell, J.
Fleming, P. A.
Geil, K.
Jacobs, K.
Jones, A.
Knowlton, K.
Koh, J.
Lemos, M. C.
Melillo, J.
Pandya, R.
Richmond, T. C.
Scarlett, L.
Snyder, J.
Stults, M.
Waple, A. M.
Whitehead, J.
Zarrilli, D.
Ayyub, B. M.
Fox, J.
Ganguly, A.
Joppa, L.
Julius, S.
Kirshen, P.
Kreutter, R.
McGovern, A.
Meyer, R.
Neumann, J.
Solecki, W.
Smith, J.
Tissot, P.
Yohe, G.
Zimmerman, R.
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Ctr Climate Adaptat Sci & SolutIssue Date
2019-07
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOCCitation
Moss, R. H., Avery, S., Baja, K., Burkett, M., Chischilly, A. M., Dell, J., ... & Knowlton, K. (2019). Evaluating Knowledge to Support Climate Action: A Framework for Sustained Assessment. Report of an Independent Advisory Committee on Applied Climate Assessment. Weather, Climate, and Society, 11(3), 465-487.Journal
WEATHER CLIMATE AND SOCIETYRights
© 2019 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
As states, cities, tribes, and private interests cope with climate damages and seek to increase preparedness and resilience, they will need to navigate myriad choices and options available to them. Making these choices in ways that identify pathways for climate action that support their development objectives will require constructive public dialogue, community participation, and flexible and ongoing access to science- and experience-based knowledge. In 2016, a Federal Advisory Committee (FAC) was convened to recommend how to conduct a sustained National Climate Assessment (NCA) to increase the relevance and usability of assessments for informing action. The FAC was disbanded in 2017, but members and additional experts reconvened to complete the report that is presented here. A key recommendation is establishing a new nonfederal "climate assessment consortium" to increase the role of state/local/tribal government and civil society in assessments. The expanded process would 1) focus on applied problems faced by practitioners, 2) organize sustained partnerships for collaborative learning across similar projects and case studies to identify effective tested practices, and 3) assess and improve knowledge-based methods for project implementation. Specific recommendations include evaluating climate models and data using user-defined metrics; improving benefit-cost assessment and supporting decision-making under uncertainty; and accelerating application of tools and methods such as citizen science, artificial intelligence, indicators, and geospatial analysis. The recommendations are the result of broad consultation and present an ambitious agenda for federal agencies, state/local/tribal jurisdictions, universities and the research sector, professional associations, nongovernmental and community-based organizations, and private-sector firms.Note
6 month embargo; published online: 21 May 2019ISSN
1948-8327EISSN
1948-8335Version
Final published versionSponsors
New York State Energy Research and Development Authority [123416]; Columbia University's Earth Institute; American Meteorological Society; Kresge Foundationae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1175/wcas-d-18-0134.1
