Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKooyers, Nicholas J
dc.contributor.authorBlackman, Benjamin K
dc.contributor.authorHoleski, Liza M
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-26T23:50:03Z
dc.date.available2019-08-26T23:50:03Z
dc.date.issued2017-04-01
dc.identifier.citationKooyers, N. J., Blackman, B. K., & Holeski, L. M. (2017). Optimal defense theory explains deviations from latitudinal herbivory defense hypothesis. Ecology, 98(4), 1036-1048.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0012-9658
dc.identifier.pmid28074474
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ecy.1731
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/634001
dc.description.abstractThe latitudinal herbivory defense hypothesis (LHDH) postulates that the prevalence of species interactions, including herbivory, is greater at lower latitudes, leading to selection for increased levels of plant defense. While latitudinal defense clines may be caused by spatial variation in herbivore pressure, optimal defense theory predicts that clines could also be caused by ecogeographic variation in the cost of defense. For instance, allocation of resources to defense may not increase plant fitness when growing seasons are short and plants must reproduce quickly. Here we use a common garden experiment to survey genetic variation for constitutive and induced phenylpropanoid glycoside (PPG) concentrations across 35 Mimulus guttatus populations over a similar to 13 degrees latitudinal transect. Our sampling regime is unique among studies of the LHDH in that it allows us to disentangle the effects of growing season length from those of latitude, temperature, and elevation. For five of the seven PPGs surveyed, we find associations between latitude and plant defense that are robust to population structure. However, contrary to the LHDH, only two PPGs were found at higher levels in low latitude populations, and total PPG concentrations were higher at higher latitudes. PPG levels are strongly correlated with growing season length, with higher levels of PPGs in plants from areas with longer growing seasons. Further, flowering time is positively correlated with the concentration of nearly all PPGs, suggesting that there may be a strong trade--off between development time and defense production. Our results reveal that ecogeographic patterns in plant defense may reflect variation in the cost of producing defense compounds in addition to variation in herbivore pressure. Thus, the biogeographic pattern predicted by the LHDH may not be accurate because the underlying factors driving variation in defense, in this case, growing season length, are not always associated with latitude in the same manner. Given these results, we conclude that LHDH cannot be interpreted without considering life history, and we recommend that future work on the LHDH move beyond solely testing the core LHDH prediction and place greater emphasis on isolating agents of selection that generate spatial variation in defense and herbivore pressure.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNSF [IOS-1558035]; Northern Arizona University; University of Virginia; University of California, Berkeleyen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWILEYen_US
dc.rights© 2017 by the Ecological Society of America.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectMimulus guttatus (common monkeyflower)en_US
dc.subjectbiogeographyen_US
dc.subjectchemical defenseen_US
dc.subjectclineen_US
dc.subjectflowering timeen_US
dc.subjectgenetic constrainten_US
dc.subjectherbivoryen_US
dc.subjectlatitudinal herbivory defense hypothesisen_US
dc.subjectlife historyen_US
dc.subjectoptimal defense theoryen_US
dc.subjectphenylpropanoid glycosidesen_US
dc.titleOptimal defense theory explains deviations from latitudinal herbivory defense hypothesisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniv Arizona, Dept Biol Scien_US
dc.identifier.journalECOLOGYen_US
dc.description.note12 month embargo; first published: 10 January 2017.en_US
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.source.journaltitleEcology
refterms.dateFOA2018-01-10T00:00:00Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Kooyers_et_al-2017-Ecology.pdf
Size:
2.583Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record