General and ICT Self-Efficacy in Different Participants Roles in Cyberbullying/Victimization Among Pakistani University Students
AffiliationUniv Arizona, Disabil & Psychoeduc Studies
MetadataShow full item record
PublisherFRONTIERS MEDIA SA
CitationMusharraf S, Bauman S, Anis-ul-Haque M and Malik JA (2019) General and ICT Self-Efficacy in Different Participants Roles in Cyberbullying/Victimization Among Pakistani University Students. Front. Psychol. 10:1098. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01098
JournalFRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY
RightsCopyright © 2019 Musharraf, Bauman, Anis-ul-Haque and Malik. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Collection InformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
AbstractThe study examines both general and Internet and Communication Technology (ICT) self-efficacy in cyber-victims, cyber-bullies, and cyber bully victims in comparison to un-involved students. Gender differences were also examined. A total of 1115 Pakistani university students from six universities participated in the study. Analyses were conducted on 950 complete cases (371 males, and 579 females). Data were collected on cyberbullying/victimization, general self-efficacy (GSE), ICT self-efficacy, traditional bullying/victimization, ICT usage, social desirability, and demographics. Multinomial logistic regression analysis indicated that ICT self-efficacy significantly decreased the probability of being a cyber-victim and significantly increased the chances of being a cyber-bully whereas GSE appeared to have no role in predicting participant roles in cyberbullying after controlling for covariates (i.e., age, gender, traditional bullying, traditional victimization, social desirability, Internet usage, time spent on the Internet, and social networking sites (SNS). Findings of the study have important implications for developing and enhancing interventions with respect to the inclusion of ICT related skills in anti-cyberbullying programs. With respect to gender, findings showed that females reported a higher level of victimization while males reported higher perpetration on both traditional and cyberbullying.
NoteOpen access journal.
VersionFinal published version
- [Cyber-bullying in adolescents: associated psychosocial problems and comparison with school bullying].
- Authors: Kubiszewski V, Fontaine R, Huré K, Rusch E
- Issue date: 2013 Apr
- Cyberbullying Victimization in Adolescents as Related to Body Esteem, Social Support, and Social Self-Efficacy.
- Authors: Olenik-Shemesh D, Heiman T
- Issue date: 2017 Jan-Feb
- Adolescent predictors of young adult cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among Australian youth.
- Authors: Hemphill SA, Heerde JA
- Issue date: 2014 Oct
- Pattern and correlates of cyberbullying victimization among Egyptian university students in Beni-Suef, Egypt
- Authors: Arafa A, Senosy S
- Issue date: 2017 Jun 1
- Effectiveness and sustainability of the ViSC Social Competence Program to prevent cyberbullying and cyber-victimization: Class and individual level moderators.
- Authors: Gradinger P, Yanagida T, Strohmeier D, Spiel C
- Issue date: 2016 Mar-Apr