General and ICT Self-Efficacy in Different Participants Roles in Cyberbullying/Victimization Among Pakistani University Students
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Disabil & Psychoeduc StudiesIssue Date
2019-05-14Keywords
ICT self-efficacyPakistan
cyber victimization
cyberbullying
general self-efficacy
traditional bullying
traditional victimization
university students
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
FRONTIERS MEDIA SACitation
Musharraf S, Bauman S, Anis-ul-Haque M and Malik JA (2019) General and ICT Self-Efficacy in Different Participants Roles in Cyberbullying/Victimization Among Pakistani University Students. Front. Psychol. 10:1098. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01098Journal
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGYRights
Copyright © 2019 Musharraf, Bauman, Anis-ul-Haque and Malik. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
The study examines both general and Internet and Communication Technology (ICT) self-efficacy in cyber-victims, cyber-bullies, and cyber bully victims in comparison to un-involved students. Gender differences were also examined. A total of 1115 Pakistani university students from six universities participated in the study. Analyses were conducted on 950 complete cases (371 males, and 579 females). Data were collected on cyberbullying/victimization, general self-efficacy (GSE), ICT self-efficacy, traditional bullying/victimization, ICT usage, social desirability, and demographics. Multinomial logistic regression analysis indicated that ICT self-efficacy significantly decreased the probability of being a cyber-victim and significantly increased the chances of being a cyber-bully whereas GSE appeared to have no role in predicting participant roles in cyberbullying after controlling for covariates (i.e., age, gender, traditional bullying, traditional victimization, social desirability, Internet usage, time spent on the Internet, and social networking sites (SNS). Findings of the study have important implications for developing and enhancing interventions with respect to the inclusion of ICT related skills in anti-cyberbullying programs. With respect to gender, findings showed that females reported a higher level of victimization while males reported higher perpetration on both traditional and cyberbullying.Note
Open access journal.ISSN
1664-1078PubMed ID
31139126Version
Final published versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01098
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2019 Musharraf, Bauman, Anis-ul-Haque and Malik. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).
Related articles
- [Cyber-bullying in adolescents: associated psychosocial problems and comparison with school bullying].
- Authors: Kubiszewski V, Fontaine R, Huré K, Rusch E
- Issue date: 2013 Apr
- Cyberbullying Victimization in Adolescents as Related to Body Esteem, Social Support, and Social Self-Efficacy.
- Authors: Olenik-Shemesh D, Heiman T
- Issue date: 2017 Jan-Feb
- Pattern and correlates of cyberbullying victimization among Egyptian university students in Beni-Suef, Egypt.
- Authors: Arafa A, Senosy S
- Issue date: 2017 Jun 1
- Adolescent predictors of young adult cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among Australian youth.
- Authors: Hemphill SA, Heerde JA
- Issue date: 2014 Oct
- The relationship of childhood trauma with cyberbullying and cyber victimization among university students.
- Authors: Akarsu Ö, Budak Mİ, Okanlı A
- Issue date: 2022 Dec