CALL Beliefs in Context: a Study of US High School Foreign Language Learners
Name:
Computer_Assisted_Language_Lea ...
Size:
401.0Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Author
Hellmich, Emily A.Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Dept French & ItalianIssue Date
2019-07-26
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTDCitation
Emily A. Hellmich (2019) CALL Beliefs in Context: a Study of US High School Foreign Language Learners, Computer Assisted Language Learning, DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2019.1643739Rights
© 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Recent calls from applied linguistics and from CALL have emphasized the importance of situating the understanding and use of digital tools for language learning within layered contexts. An important component of these layered contexts is societal discourses of technology, which are multiple and far from neutral. In response to these calls, this study examines how students at one San Francisco Bay Area high school understand technology in foreign language learning and how these beliefs relate to regional discourses of technology. The study assumed an ecological theoretical frame and deployed a multi-pronged research design: a survey study (n = 283), a case study (n = 3), and a discourse analysis of a regional newspaper corpus (n = 372). Findings indicate that students held largely utilitarian beliefs about CALL that both aligned with and diverged from regional discourses. Instances of alignment suggest the potential influence of larger societal discourses on student beliefs about CALL while instances of divergence underscore the need to address the larger role of technology in society when considering CALL beliefs and practices.Note
18 month embargo; published online: 26 July 2019ISSN
0958-8221Version
Final accepted manuscriptSponsors
University of Arizona College of Humanities Faculty Research Grantae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1080/09588221.2019.1643739