Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLawler, S. M.
dc.contributor.authorPike, R. E.
dc.contributor.authorKaib, N.
dc.contributor.authorAlexandersen, M.
dc.contributor.authorBannister, M. T.
dc.contributor.authorChen, Y.-T.
dc.contributor.authorGladman, B.
dc.contributor.authorGwyn, S.
dc.contributor.authorKavelaars, J. J.
dc.contributor.authorPetit, J.-M.
dc.contributor.authorVolk, K.
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-05T00:24:50Z
dc.date.available2019-10-05T00:24:50Z
dc.date.issued2019-06-04
dc.identifier.citationS. M. Lawler et al 2019 AJ 157 253en_US
dc.identifier.issn0004-6256
dc.identifier.doi10.3847/1538-3881/ab1c4c
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/634681
dc.description.abstractThe migration of Neptune's resonances through the proto-Kuiper Belt has been imprinted in the distribution of small bodies in the outer solar system. Here we analyze five published Neptune migration models in detail, focusing on the high pericenter distance (high-q) trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs) near Neptune's 5:2 and 3:1 mean-motion resonances because they have large resonant populations, are outside the main classical belt, and are relatively isolated from other strong resonances. We compare the observationally biased output from these dynamical models with the detected TNOs from the Outer Solar System Origins Survey (OSSOS) via its Survey Simulator. All four of the new OSSOS detections of high-q nonresonant TNOs are on the sunward side of the 5:2 and 3:1 resonances. We show that even after accounting for observation biases, this asymmetric distribution cannot be drawn from a uniform distribution of TNOs at 2 sigma confidence. As shown by previous work, our analysis here tentatively confirms that the dynamical model that uses grainy slow Neptune migration provides the best match to the real high-q TNO orbital data. However, due to extreme observational biases, we have very few high-q TNO discoveries with which to statistically constrain the models. Thus, this analysis provides a framework for future comparison between the output from detailed, dynamically classified Neptune migration simulations and the TNO discoveries from future well-characterized surveys. We show that a deeper survey (to a limiting r-magnitude of 26.0) with a similar survey area to OSSOS could statistically distinguish between these five Neptune migration models.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNRC-Canada Plaskett Fellowship; UK STFC [ST/P0003094/1]; NASA [NNX15AH59G, NNX14AG93G]; NSF [AST-1824869]en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIOP PUBLISHING LTDen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2019. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectcelestial mechanicsen_US
dc.subjectKuiper Belt: generalen_US
dc.titleOSSOS. XIII. Fossilized Resonant Dropouts Tentatively Confirm Neptune’s Migration Was Grainy and Slowen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniv Arizona, Lunar & Planetary Laben_US
dc.identifier.journalASTRONOMICAL JOURNALen_US
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.source.volume157
dc.source.issue6
dc.source.beginpage253
refterms.dateFOA2019-10-05T00:24:51Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Lawler_2019_AJ_157_253.pdf
Size:
1.224Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record