Impact of changes in home smoking bans on tobacco cessation among quitline callers
Name:
Impact_of_home_smoking_bans_UN ...
Size:
315.0Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final accepted manuscript
Affiliation
Department of Health Promotion SciencesDivision of Biobehavioral Health Sciences
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics
Issue Date
2019-06-01
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESSCitation
Nicole P Yuan, Uma S Nair, Tracy E Crane, Laurie Krupski, Bradley N Collins, Melanie L Bell, Impact of changes in home smoking bans on tobacco cessation among quitline callers, Health Education Research, Volume 34, Issue 3, June 2019, Pages 345–355, https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyz008Journal
Health Education ResearchRights
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Home smoking bans may be an effective way to promote tobacco cessation among treatment seeking smokers. Few studies have examined this relationship in a quitline setting. Data were obtained from 14,296 adults who were enrolled in a state quitline between January 2011 and July 2016. This study investigated whether cessation rates varied by changes in home smoking ban implementation between enrollment and 7-month follow-up. The impact of changes in home smoking bans on cessation at follow-up was significantly modified by having other smokers living in the home at follow-up (p<0.0001). Among callers who did not live with other smokers in the home, the highest odds ratio of 30-day cessation was for callers who reported bans at follow-up only (OR=10.50, 95%CI: 8.00, 13.70), followed by callers who reported bans at both enrollment and follow-up (OR=8.02, 95%CI: 6.27, 10.30) and callers who reported bans at enrollment only (OR=2.06, 95%CI:1.47, 2.89) compared to callers with no home smoking bans. When callers reported that they lived with other smokers in the home, the effect of home smoking bans on cessation was much smaller. Quitlines should support the implementation of home smoking bans as a part of callers’ goal setting activities to achieve tobacco cessation.Note
12 month embargo; published 01 April 2019ISSN
1465-3648PubMed ID
30932151Version
Final accepted manuscriptSponsors
Arizona Department of Health Services [ADHS13026130, ADHS11-007339, HS160051-0/E1H37741]; National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health [P30 CA023074]ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1093/her/cyz008
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Tobacco Use Cessation Among Quitline Callers Who Implemented Complete Home Smoking Bans During the Quitting Process.
- Authors: Jung AM, Schweers N, Bell ML, Nair U, Yuan NP
- Issue date: 2017 Oct 26
- Feasibility and Early Outcomes of a Tailored Quitline Protocol for Smokers With Mental Health Conditions.
- Authors: Carpenter KM, Nash CM, Vargas-Belcher RA, Vickerman KA, Haufle V
- Issue date: 2019 Apr 17
- Predictors of Tobacco Cessation Among American Indian/Alaska Native Adults Enrolled in a State Quitline.
- Authors: Yuan NP, Schultz JL, Nair US, Bell ML
- Issue date: 2020
- Daily Cannabis Use Is a Barrier to Tobacco Cessation Among Tobacco Quitline Callers at 7-Month Follow-up.
- Authors: Goodwin RD, Shevorykin A, Carl E, Budney AJ, Rivard C, Wu M, McClure EA, Hyland A, Sheffer CE
- Issue date: 2022 Oct 17
- [More] evidence to support oral health promotion services targeted to smokers calling tobacco quitlines in the United States.
- Authors: McClure JB, Riggs K, St John J, Catz SL
- Issue date: 2013 Apr 11