Estimating surface orientation from microfacet Mueller matrix bidirectional reflectance distribution function models in outdoor passive imaging polarimetry
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Coll Opt SciIssue Date
2019-04-25Keywords
land surfacereflection models
polarized light scattering
Mueller matrix bidirectional reflectance distribution function
bidirectional reflectance distribution matrix
bidirectional polarized reflectance distribution function
multiangle spectropolarimetric imager
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Meredith Kupinski, Christine Bradley, David Diner, Feng Xu, and Russell Chipman "Estimating surface orientation from microfacet Mueller matrix bidirectional reflectance distribution function models in outdoor passive imaging polarimetry," Optical Engineering 58(8), 082416 (25 April 2019). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.58.8.082416Journal
OPTICAL ENGINEERINGRights
Copyright © The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Representative examples from 3 years of measurements from JPL’s ground-based multiangle spectropolarimetric imager (GroundMSPI) are compared to a Mueller matrix bidirectional reflectance distribution function (mmBRDF). This mmBRDF is used to model polarized light scattering from solar illuminated surfaces. The camera uses a photoelastic-modulator-based polarimetric imaging technique to measure linear Stokes parameters in three wavebands (470, 660, and 865 nm) with a ±0.005 uncertainty in degree of linear polarization. GroundMSPI measurements are made over a range of scattering angles determined from a fixed viewing geometry and varying sun positions over time. This microfacet mmBRDF model predicts an angle of the linear polarization that is consistently perpendicular to the scattering plane and therefore is only appropriate for rough surface types. The model is comprised of a volumetric reflection term plus a specular reflection term of Fresnel-reflecting microfacets. The following modifications to this mmBRDF model are evaluated: an apodizing shadowing function, a Bréon or Gaussian microfacet scattering density function, and treating the surface orientation as an additional model parameter in the specular reflection term. The root-mean-square error (RMSE) between the GroundMSPI measurements and these various forms of the microfacet mmBRDF model is reported. Four example scenes for which a shadowed-Bréon microfacet mmBRDF model yields realistic estimates of surface orientation, and the lowest RMSE among other model options are shown.Note
Open access articleISSN
0091-3286Version
Final published versionSponsors
National Science FoundationNational Science Foundation (NSF) [CHE-1313892]; National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Jet Propulsion Laboratories under University of Arizona; National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Aeronautics & Space Administration (NASA)ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1117/1.oe.58.8.082416
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License.

