• I Did It—For Range Sake!

      Linhart, Brandi (Society for Range Management, 1988-12-01)
    • I Know the Cattle: A Poem for Joyce

      Bump, Katie (Society for Range Management, 1989-12-01)
    • I'm Not Satisfied With the Journal…!

      Schultz, A. M. (Society for Range Management, 1958-05-01)
    • Iberlin Brothers Fight Low Profits and Predators as Sheep Market Rises

      Slocum, Kenneth G. (Society for Range Management, 1979-04-01)
    • ICARDA's Rangeland Ecology and Management Research Strategy for Nontropical Dry Areas

      Louhaichi, Mounir (Society for Range Management, 2011-08-01)
    • Idaho Rangeland Resource Commission: Commitment to Rangeland Education

      Hyde, Gretchen; Crane, Kelly (Society for Range Management, 2011-08-01)
    • Idaho State Parks: Discovering the Undiscovered America

      Just, Rick (Society for Range Management, 1986-10-01)
    • Ideal Free Distributions of Mobile Pastoralists in Multiple Seasonal Grazing Areas

      Moritz, M.; Hamilton, I. M.; Scholte, P.; Chen, Y. -J. (Society for Range Management, 2014-11)
      The pastoral system in the Far North Region of Cameroon is best described as an open system in which mobile pastoralists have open access to common-pool grazing resources. We hypothesized that there is a self-organizing management system of open access to common-pool grazing resources and predicted that we would find an Ideal Free Distribution (IFD) of mobile pastoralists within seasonal grazing areas. In this paper we used mobility data and remote sensing data from two seasonal grazing areas at the end of the dry season in three consecutive years to evaluate that hypothesis. We found evidence of an IFD in the two seasonal grazing areas of the Logone Floodplain and the Lake Maga area. These findings offer further support for our hypothesis that there is a complex adaptive system in which pastoralists distribute themselves effectively over available grazing resources. © 2014 Society for Range Management
    • Identification and Creation of Optimum Habitat Conditions for Livestock

      Bailey, Derek W. (Society for Range Management, 2005-03-01)
      Optimum habitat condition is a concept typically used for wildlife rather than livestock. The definition for optimal livestock habitat will vary with management objectives. Abiotic factors, such as topography, water availability, and thermal cover, affect animal performance and uniformity of grazing. Livestock usually prefer gentle slopes and avoid traveling long horizontal and vertical distances to water. Shade and nearby water are used for thermoregulation when temperatures are high, and topographic relief and woody vegetation can be used for thermal cover during cooler temperatures. Biotic factors, such as forage quality and quantity, influence spatial grazing preferences and affect animal performance. Livestock prefer areas with higher forage quality and quantity. Uniformity of grazing may be greater in homogeneous vegetation, but animal performance may be greater in heterogeneous vegetation, especially at lower stocking rates. Livestock grazing patterns have been predicted using multiple regression and other models, but their success has typically been limited to a specific site. Managers can improve livestock habitat conditions by changing abiotic attributes of the pastures, such as developing water, building structures for thermal cover, and changing biotic attributes of the pasture through burning, fertilizing, varying stocking rates, and manipulating grazing systems. Managers can also choose animals that are more adapted to specific rangeland conditions. Practices such as strategic supplementation and herding can modify livestock behavioral patterns to use more of the available habitat. The spatial and temporal variability of rangeland requires multiple management practices to optimize use of livestock habitat.  
    • Identification of Subspecies of Big Sagebrush by Ultraviolet Spectrophotometry

      Shumar, M. L.; Anderson, J. E.; Reynolds, T. D. (Society for Range Management, 1982-01-01)
      The three subspecies of big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) are dominant shrubs over much of the Intermountain West. Because the subspecies differ in palatability and habitat requirements, researchers and resource managers have become increasingly concerned with their identification. Subspecies have been identified by leaf morphology, ultraviolet (UV) fluorescence, or chromatography. Fluorescence of leaf extracts under short-wave UV light provides a convenient technique for distinguishing between A.t. vaseyana and the other two subspecies, but this technique will not distinguish between A.t. tridentata and A.t. wyomingensis. Chromatographic techniques can differentiate between all of the subspecies, but the methods are tedious. We describe a technique for distinguishing all three subspecies by UV spectrophotometry. Alcohol leaf extracts of the three subspecies produce relative absorbance graphs that differ markedly from one another between 230 and 280 nm.
    • Identifying Greenbriar Growth

      Crawford, H. S. (Society for Range Management, 1961-01-01)
    • Identifying Montana hunter/rancher problems and solutions

      Swensson, E. J.; Knight, J. E. (Society for Range Management, 1998-07-01)
      A 1 year survey was developed to identify conflicts and solutions to conflicts between hunters and ranchers. A questionnaire was mailed to randomly selected groups of 1,000 hunters and 989 ranchers in Montana. One-third of the questionnaire was different for the 2 groups and consisted of questions relating to background information. The other two-thirds was identical between the groups and presented questions related to perceived problems and solutions, big game populations, importance of private and agricultural land to wildlife and hunter/rancher representation. Thirty-five percent of the hunters and 42% of the ranchers responded to the survey. The top 3 conflicts between hunters and ranchers as identified by hunters were too little access to private land, driving off roads, and trespassing. The top 3 solutions selected by hunters were greater consideration and appreciation by ranchers, better communication between groups, and better boundary identification. The top 3 problems identified by ranchers were driving off roads, trespassing, and too many hunters. The top 3 solutions selected by ranchers were stiffer penalties for violators, better communication between groups, and greater consideration and appreciation by hunters. Both hunters and ranchers ranked driving off roads and trespassing in their top 3 problems and ranked better communication and greater consideration and appreciation in their top 3 solutions. Hunters and ranchers have different (P < 0.01) views of who represents them in hunter/rancher related issues. Forty-seven percent of the hunters responding believe they represent themselves or have no representation; whereas, 57% of the ranchers responding indicated they are represented by livestock producer groups. Results of this survey indicate that hunters and ranchers have similar concerns and better communication will help alleviate conflicting interests.
    • Identifying Plant Poisoning in Livestock

      Stegelmeier, Bryan L.; Green, Benedict T.; Panter, Kip E.; Welch, Kevin D.; Hall, Jeffrey O. (Society for Range Management, 2009-02-01)
    • Identifying Rangeland Restoration Targets: An Appraisal of Challenges and Opportunities

      Monaco, Thomas A.; Jones, Thomas A.; Thurow, Thomas L. (Society for Range Management, 2012-11-01)
      Restoration activities are directed toward a broad spectrum of targets. Identifying a restoration target entails defining an ecosystem state and its desired functioning that can be attained through managerial interventions. First, we discuss how restoration targets must integrate economic, social, and ecological considerations in order to be feasible. Primary challenges to identifying realistic restoration targets include long-term managerial and fiscal commitments as well as the accommodation of inherent rangeland complexities stemming from social and ecological factors. Second, we illustrate how the existing tools of ecological site description, rangeland health assessment, and state-and-transition modeling present opportunities to identify flexible restoration targets. Last, we describe how to refine these targets using adaptive management in order to cope with constraints and to reduce the uncertainty of ecosystem dynamics typical of complex systems. Restoration should be viewed as both a rangeland management activity and a means to inform and guide interventions within a specific site./Las actividades de rehabilitación implica la definición del estado del ecosistema y el funcionamiento deseado que puede alcanzarse a través de intervenciones de manejo. Primero, discutimos cómo los objetivos de rehabilitación deben integrar factores económicos, sociales y ecológicos, con el fin de ser factibles. Los principales desafíos para la identificación de objetivos realistas de rehabilitación incluyen compromisos de manejo y económicos a largo plazo. Así también deben incluirse otros elementos innatos de los pastizales derivados de los factores sociales y ecológicos. Segundo, ilustramos cómo la existencia de herramientas para descripción ecológica de los sitios, evaluación del bienestar del pastizal, y el modelado del estado y transición representan oportunidades para identificar objetivos de rehabilitación. Finalmente, describimos cómo redefinir estos objetivos usando manejo adaptativo con el fin de hacer frente a limitaciones y reducir la incertidumbre de la dinámica de los ecosistemas típicamente de los sistemas complejos. La rehabilitación debe ser vista tanto como una actividad del manejo de pastizales como de un medio para informar y guiar las mediaciones en un sitio especifico.
    • Identifying Shinola

      Williamson, Lonnie L. (Society for Range Management, 1992-04-01)
    • If You Aren't Part of the Solution, You Are Part of the Problem

      Tipton, F. H. (Society for Range Management, 1988-10-01)
    • Image Interpreter Tool: An ArcGIS Tool for Estimating Vegetation Cover From High-Resolution Imagery

      Schrader, T. Scott; Duniway, Michael C. (Society for Range Management, 2011-08-01)
    • Imbibition by Alkali Sacaton Seeds

      Knipe, O. D. (Society for Range Management, 1971-01-01)
      Alkali sacaton (Sporobolus airoides Torr.) seeds imbibed water rapidly. Large seeds gained 47% and small seeds gained 71% of their dry weight within the first 30 min after wetting. The large seeds had gained 124% and the small seeds 165% of their dry weight after 72 hr.
    • Imbibition temperature affects winterfat (Eurotia lanata (Pursh) Moq.) seed hydration and cold-hardiness response

      Bai, Y.; Booth, D. T.; Romo, J. T. (Society for Range Management, 1999-05-01)
      Winterfat (Eurotia lanata (Pursh) Moq.) diaspores harvested from 1 Canadian and 2 USA sites were imbibed at 0, 5, 10, and 20 degrees C. It was hypothesized that imbibition temperature affects seed hydration which is related to cold-hardiness of winterfat. Weight gain was measured at 8-hour intervals until full hydration, and embryo water content was determined. Water content of fully hydrated seeds differed among collections and lower imbibition temperatures were always associated with greater seed water content. Differences in water content of seeds imbibed at different temperatures was related to cold-hardiness. When water content of embryos was measured, differences among imbibition temperatures existed, but were reduced. Differences in seed water content among imbibition temperatures were mainly due to endosperm other than the embryo because the embryo hydrated faster than other seed parts. Suggestions were made for modeling seed water relations based on this study.
    • Immature Seedling Growth of Two North American Native Perennial Bunchgrasses and the Invasive Grass Bromus tectorum

      Ray-Mukherjee, Jayanti; Jones, Thomas A.; Adler, Peter B.; Monaco, Thomas A. (Society for Range Management, 2011-07-01)
      Pseudoroegneria spicata (Pursh) A. Löve and Elymus wawawaiensis J. Carlson Barkworth are two native perennial grasses widely used for restoration in the Intermountain West. However, the rapid establishment and spread of Bromus tectorum L., an invasive annual grass, has led to a decline in the abundance of native perennial grasses. Proliferation of B. tectorum has been attributed to its early germination, superior cold-temperature growth, profuse root production, and high specific leaf area (SLA). To enhance restoration success, we compared B. tectorum to commercially available plant materials of two perennial rangeland bunchgrasses, P. spicata (cv. Whitmar, cv. Goldar, and Anatone Germplasm) and E. wawawaiensis (cv. Secar), for germination, seedling morphological traits, and growth rates at the immature seedling stage. We monitored germination and immature seedling growth in a growth chamber in two separate experiments, one under low (5/10 degreesC) and the other under high (15/20 degreesC) day/night temperatures. Compared to the average of the two perennials, B. tectorum was 93% (77%) greater at high (and low) temperature for root:shoot length ratio, but only 14% (14%) greater for root:shoot biomass ratio and 12% (19%) lower for SLA. This suggests that B. tectorum’s substantial investment in surface area of roots, rather than in shoot length, root biomass, or leaf area, may be responsible for the annual’s success at the early seedling stage. Compared to E. wawawaiensis, P. spicata averaged 65% (41%) higher shoot biomass, 39% (88%) higher root biomass, and 70% (10%) higher absolute growth rate, but 25% (15%) lower SLA and 15% (36%) lower specific root length (SRL) at high (and low) temperatures, respectively. Although P. spicata’s greater productivity may initially make for better seedling establishment than E. wawawaiensis, it may also prove disadvantageous in competitive or highly resource-limited environments where high SLA or SRL could be an advantage.