Febrile neutropenia hospitalization due to pegfilgrastim on-body injector failure compared to single-injection pegfilgrastim and daily injections with reference and biosimilar filgrastim: US cost simulation for lung cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma
Name:
Febrile neutropenia hospitalization ...
Size:
1.194Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Author
McBride, AliKrendyukov, Andriy
Mathieson, Nicola
Campbell, Kim
Balu, Sanjeev
Natek, Maja
MacDonald, Karen
Abraham, Ivo
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Canc CtrUniv Arizona, Ctr Hlth Outcomes & PharmacoEcon Res
Univ Arizona, Coll Pharm
Univ Arizona, Coll Med
Issue Date
2019-09-03
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTDCitation
McBride, A., Krendyukov, A., Mathieson, N., Campbell, K., Balu, S., Natek, M., ... & Abraham, I. (2019). Febrile neutropenia hospitalization due to pegfilgrastim on-body injector failure compared to single-injection pegfilgrastim and daily injections with reference and biosimilar filgrastim: US cost simulation for lung cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Journal of medical economics, 1-9.Journal
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICSRights
Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Background: Guidelines recommend febrile neutropenia (FN) prophylaxis following myelotoxic chemotherapy with either daily injections of filgrastim (Neupogen®) or biosimilar filgrastim-sndz (Zarzio/Zarxio®), single-injection pegfilgrastim (Neulasta®), or pegfilgrastim administered through an on-body injector (PEG-OBI; Neulasta® Onpro®). PEG-OBI failure rates up to 6.9% have been reported, putting patients at incremental risk for FN and FN-related hospitalization. Our objective was to estimate, from a US payer perspective, the incremental costs of FN hospitalizations and the total incremental costs associated with PEG-OBI prophylaxis at varying device failure rates over assured FN prophylaxis with daily injections of filgrastim or filgrastim-sndz or a single injection of pegfilgrastim. Methods: Cost simulations comparing prophylaxis with PEG-OBI at failure rates of 1-10% versus assured prophylaxis in cycle 1 of chemotherapy were performed for panels of 10,000 patients with lung cancer treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide (1 analysis) or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) treated with CHOP or CNOP (2 analyses). Daily injection scenarios were 4.3, 5, and 11 injections for lung cancer and 5, 6.5, and 11 for NHL. The analyses are from the US payer perspective. Results: For lung cancer, the total incremental cost of PEG-OBI prophylaxis at varying failure rates and durations ranged from $6,691,969‒$31,765,299 over filgrastim and $18,901,969‒$36,538,299 over filgrastim-sndz. For NHL, in scenario 1, the total incremental costs ranged from $6,794,984‒$30,361,345 over filgrastim and $19,004,984‒$35,911,345 over filgrastim-sndz; in scenario 2, the incremental costs ranged from $7,003,657‒$32,448,067 over filgrastim and $19,213,657‒$37,998,067 over filgrastim-sndz. Conclusions: In this simulation, the incremental costs of FN-related hospitalization due to PEG-OBI failure in cycle 1 compared to assured prophylaxis with reference pegfilgrastim, reference filgrastim, and biosimilar filgrastim-sndz varied depending upon the PEG-OBI failure rate and the alternative G-CSF prophylaxis option. Biosimilar filgrastim-sndz offers the greatest cost-efficiency.Note
Open access articleISSN
1369-6998PubMed ID
31433700Version
Final published versionSponsors
Hexal AG, Holzkirchen, Germanyae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1080/13696998.2019.1658591
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Related articles
- Cost-efficiency analyses for the US of biosimilar filgrastim-sndz, reference filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, and pegfilgrastim with on-body injector in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced (febrile) neutropenia.
- Authors: McBride A, Campbell K, Bikkina M, MacDonald K, Abraham I, Balu S
- Issue date: 2017 Oct
- Conversion from pegfilgrastim with on-body injector to pegfilgrastim-jmdb: cost-efficiency analysis and budget-neutral expanded access to prophylaxis and treatment.
- Authors: McBride A, MacDonald K, Fuentes-Alburo A, Abraham I
- Issue date: 2021 Jan-Dec
- Conversion to supportive care with biosimilar pegfilgrastim-cbqv enables budget-neutral expanded access to R-CHOP treatment in non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
- Authors: McBride A, MacDonald K, Abraham I
- Issue date: 2021 Jul
- Comparison of effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim (Nivestim™), reference Amgen filgrastim and pegfilgrastim in febrile neutropenia primary prevention in breast cancer patients treated with neo(adjuvant) TAC: a non-interventional cohort study.
- Authors: Brito M, Esteves S, André R, Isidoro M, Moreira A
- Issue date: 2016 Feb
- A prospective study to evaluate febrile neutropenia incidence in patients receiving pegfilgrastim on-body injector vs other choices.
- Authors: Rifkin RM, Crawford J, Mahtani RL, Dale DC, Narang M, MacLaughlin WW, Huynh C, Gawade PL, Lewis S, DeCosta L, Lawrence T, Belani R
- Issue date: 2022 Oct

