An Unexpected Romance: Reevaluating the Authorship of the Khosrow-nāma
O'Malley, Austin. An Unexpected ...
Final Published Version
AffiliationMiddle East and North African Studies
Univ Arizona, Sch Middle Eastern & North African Studies
MetadataShow full item record
PublisherMiddle East Medievalists
CitationO'Malley, Austin. "An Unexpected Romance: Reevaluating the Authorship of the Khosrow-nāma." Al-ʿUṣur al-Wusṭā: The Journal of Middle East Medievalists 27 (2019): 201-232.
RightsCC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Copyright is held by the author(s) or the publisher. If your intended use exceeds the permitted uses specified by the license, contact the publisher for more information.
Collection InformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
AbstractThis article examines the authorship of the Khosrow-nāma, a Perso-Hellenic romance traditionally attributed to ʿAṭṭār. Forty years ago, Shafiʿi-Kadkani laid out a complex argument against ʿAṭṭār’s authorship. He claimed that the attribution was a result of a later forgery, basing his argument on internal chronological evidence, religious and stylistic markers, and the manuscript tradition. The present article systematically evaluates this argument, showing it to be less persuasive than it first appears. First, I introduce new manuscript evidence to demonstrate that the poem was circulating under ʿAṭṭār’s name already before the time of the alleged forgery. I then reassess the internal evidence to show that the Khosrow-nāma could, in fact, fit into a plausible chronology of ʿAṭṭār’s oeuvre. Next, I critique the stylistic and religious arguments against ʿAṭṭār’s authorship, arguing that the romance does not deviate from ʿAṭṭār’s undisputed works nearly as much as is often supposed. I conclude by suggesting that the available data are explained more easily by accepting ʿAṭṭār’s authorship than by adopting the theory of a later forgery.
NoteOpen access article
VersionFinal published version
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Copyright is held by the author(s) or the publisher. If your intended use exceeds the permitted uses specified by the license, contact the publisher for more information.