Foreign Geographical Indications, Consumer Preferences, and the Domestic Market for Cheese
Name:
Manuscript_Slade_Josephson_Mic ...
Size:
2.662Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Dept Agr & Resource EconIssue Date
2019-08-07
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS INCCitation
Peter Slade, Jeffrey D Michler, Anna Josephson, Foreign Geographical Indications, Consumer Preferences, and the Domestic Market for Cheese, Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Volume 41, Issue 3, September 2019, Pages 370–390, https://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppz010Rights
Copyright © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association. All rights reserved.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
The protection of geographical indications (GIs) is an important feature of modern trade agreements. In the Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), Canada agreed to stronger protections for GIs of European cheeses and other food products. Under this agreement, new Canadian producers can no longer label cheese as “feta” but instead must refer to it as “imitation feta,” “feta style,” or “feta type.” We use a choice experiment to determine the effect of this agreement on Canadian cheese producers. We find that the effect of GI recognition varies depending on the terms used to label Canadian cheese and the information given to consumers. The results imply that policies that give greater latitude to food marketers will weaken the impact of GI recognition.Note
24 month embargo; published online: 7 August 2019ISSN
2040-5790EISSN
2040-5804Version
Final accepted manuscriptae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1093/aepp/ppz010
