Invasive Cardiac Procedures in Interstage Single Ventricle Patients in Emergent Hospitalizations
Name:
CHD manuscript REVISION.pdf
Size:
147.6Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Dept PediatUniv Arizona, Dept Pediat Cardiol
Univ Arizona, Dept Emergency Med
Univ Arizona, Dept Surg Pediat Cardiothorac
Issue Date
2019-11-08
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
SPRINGERCitation
Haughey, B.S., White, S.C., Pacheco, G.S. et al. Invasive Cardiac Procedures in Interstage Single Ventricle Patients in Emergent Hospitalizations. Pediatr Cardiol (2019) doi:10.1007/s00246-019-02247-4Journal
PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGYRights
Copyright © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Single ventricle congenital heart disease (SV CHD) patients are at risk of morbidity and mortality between the first and second palliative surgical procedures (interstage). When these patients present acutely they often require invasive intervention. This study sought to compare the outcomes and costs of elective and emergent invasive cardiac procedures for interstage patients. Retrospective review of discharge data from The Vizient Clinical Data Base/Resource Manager™, a national health care analytics platform. The database was queried for admissions from 10/2014 to 12/2017 for children 1-6 months old with ICD-9 or ICD-10 codes for SV CHD who underwent invasive cardiac procedures. Demographics, length of stay (LOS), complication rate, in-hospital mortality and direct costs were compared between elective and emergent admissions using t test or χ2, as appropriate. The three most frequently performed procedures were also compared. 871 admissions identified, with 141 (16%) emergent. Age of emergent admission was younger than elective (2.9 vs. 4 months p < 0.001). Emergent admissions including cardiac catheterization or superior cavo-pulmonary anastomosis had longer LOS (58.7 vs. 25.8 day, p < 0.001 and 54.8 vs .22.6 days, p < 0.001) and higher costs ($134,774 vs. $84,253, p = 0.013 and $158,679 vs. $81,899, p = 0.017). Emergent admissions for interstage SV CHD patients undergoing cardiac catheterization or superior cavo-pulmonary anastomosis are associated with longer LOS and higher direct costs, but with no differences in complications or mortality. These findings support aggressive interstage monitoring to minimize the need for emergent interventions for this fragile patient population.Note
12 month embargo; published online: 8 November 2019ISSN
0172-0643PubMed ID
31705178Version
Final accepted manuscriptae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1007/s00246-019-02247-4
