Image Flux Ratios of Gravitationally Lensed HS 0810+2554 with High-resolution Infrared Imaging
Name:
Jones_2019_AJ_158_237.pdf
Size:
869.1Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Author
Jones, Terry JayWilliams, Liliya L. R.
Ertel, Steve
Hinz, Philip M.
Vaz, Amali
Walsh, Shane
Webster, Ryan
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Dept Astron, Steward ObservIssue Date
2019-11-19
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
IOP PUBLISHING LTDCitation
Terry Jay Jones et al 2019 AJ 158 237Journal
ASTRONOMICAL JOURNALRights
Copyright © 2019. The American Astronomical Society. Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
We report near simultaneous imaging using LMIRCam on the LBTI of the quadruply imaged lensed quasar HS 0810+2554 at wavelengths of 2.16, 3.7, and 4.78 μm with a full width at half maximum spatial resolution of 0farcs13, 0farcs12, and 0farcs15 respectively, comparable to Hubble Space Telescope optical imaging. In the z = 1.5 rest frame of the quasar, the observed wavelengths correspond to 0.86, 1.48, and 1.91 μm respectively. The two brightest images in the quad, A and B, are clearly resolved from each other with a separation of 0farcs187. The flux ratio of these two images (A/B) trends from 1.79 to 1.23 at wavelengths from 2.16 to 4.78 μm. The trend in flux ratio is consistent with the 2.16 μm flux originating from a small sized accretion disk in the quasar that experiences only microlensing. The excess flux above the contribution from the accretion disk at the two longer wavelengths originates from a larger sized region that experiences no microlensing. A simple model employing multiplicative factors for image B due to stellar microlensing (m) and substructure millilensing (M) is presented. The result is tightly constrained to the product m × M = 1.79. Given the observational errors, the 60% probability contour for this product stretches from m = 2.6, M = 0.69 to m = 1.79, M = 1.0, where the later is consistent with microlensing only.Note
Open access articleISSN
0004-6256Version
Final published versionSponsors
National Aeronautics & Space Administration (NASA); National Science Foundation (NSF)ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3847/1538-3881/ab5108
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2019. The American Astronomical Society. Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence.