Social contributors to cardiometabolic diseases in indigenous populations: an international Delphi study
Author
Stoner, LMatheson, A G
Perry, L G
Williams, M A
McManus, A
Holdaway, M
Dimer, L
Joe, J R
Maiorana, A
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Dept Family & Community MedIssue Date
2019-11-01Keywords
AustraliaDeterminants of health
Economic
Historical
Indigenous consultant
New Zealand
United States
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
W B SAUNDERS CO LTDCitation
Stoner, L., Matheson, A. G., Perry, L. G., Williams, M. A., McManus, A., Holdaway, M., ... & Maiorana, A. (2019). Social contributors to cardiometabolic diseases in indigenous populations: an international Delphi study. Public Health, 176, 133-141.Journal
PUBLIC HEALTHRights
© 2018 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to identify priority social factors contributing to indigenous cardiometabolic diseases. Study design: A three-round Delphi process was used to consolidate and compare the opinions of 60 experts in indigenous cardiometabolic health from Australia, New Zealand and the United States. Methods: Round one: three open-ended questions: (i) historical, (ii) economic and (iii) sociocultural factor contributors to cardiometabolic disease risk. Round two: a structured questionnaire based on the results from the first round; items were ranked according to perceived importance. Final round: the items were reranked after receiving the summary feedback. Results: Several key findings were identified: (i) an important historical factor is marginalisation and disempowerment; (ii) in terms of economic and sociocultural factors, the panellists came to the consensus that the socio-economic status and educational inequalities are important; and (iii) while consensus was not reached, economic and educational factors were also perceived to be historically influential. Conclusion: These findings support the need for multilevel health promotion policy. For example, tackling financial barriers that limit the access to health-promoting resources, combined with improving literacy skills to permit understanding of health education. (C) 2018 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Note
12 month embargo; published online: 26 October 2018ISSN
0033-3506PubMed ID
31796166Version
Final accepted manuscriptae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.puhe.2018.08.012
