Name:
Incorp_BD_motiv_3_Feb_2019.pdf
Size:
614.0Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Affiliation
Univ ArizonaIssue Date
2019-11Keywords
Psychological game theoryBelief-dependent motivation
Intentions
Time
Rationalizability
Self-confirming equilibrium
Bayesian sequential equilibrium
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
ELSEVIERCitation
Battigalli, P., Corrao, R., & Dufwenberg, M. (2019). Incorporating belief-dependent motivation in games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 167, 185-218.Rights
© 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Psychological game theory (PGT), introduced by Geanakoplos et al. (1989) and significantly generalized by Battigalli and Dufwenberg (2009), extends the standard game theoretic framework by letting players' utility at endnodes depend on their interactive beliefs. While it is understood that a host of applications that model and/or test the role of emotional and other psychological forces find their home in PGT, the framework is abstract and comprises complex mathematical objects, such as players' infinite hierarchies of beliefs. Thus, PGT provides little guidance on how to model specific belief-dependent motivations and use them in game theoretic analysis. This paper takes steps to fill this gap. Some aspects are simplified - e.g., which beliefs matter - but others are refined and brought closer to applications by providing more structure. We start with belief-dependent motivations and show how to embed them in game forms to obtain psychological games. We emphasize the role of time and of the perception of players' intentions. We take advantage of progress made on the foundations of game theory to expand and improve on PGT solution concepts. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.Note
36 month embargo; published online: 24 June 2019ISSN
0167-2681Version
Final accepted manuscriptSponsors
ERCEuropean Research Council (ERC) [324219]; Marco Fanno scholarshipae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.jebo.2019.04.009