Incorporating belief-dependent motivation in games
dc.contributor.author | Battigalli, Pierpaolo | |
dc.contributor.author | Corrao, Roberto | |
dc.contributor.author | Dufwenberg, Martin | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-27T19:04:17Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-27T19:04:17Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-11 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Battigalli, P., Corrao, R., & Dufwenberg, M. (2019). Incorporating belief-dependent motivation in games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 167, 185-218. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0167-2681 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jebo.2019.04.009 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/636721 | |
dc.description.abstract | Psychological game theory (PGT), introduced by Geanakoplos et al. (1989) and significantly generalized by Battigalli and Dufwenberg (2009), extends the standard game theoretic framework by letting players' utility at endnodes depend on their interactive beliefs. While it is understood that a host of applications that model and/or test the role of emotional and other psychological forces find their home in PGT, the framework is abstract and comprises complex mathematical objects, such as players' infinite hierarchies of beliefs. Thus, PGT provides little guidance on how to model specific belief-dependent motivations and use them in game theoretic analysis. This paper takes steps to fill this gap. Some aspects are simplified - e.g., which beliefs matter - but others are refined and brought closer to applications by providing more structure. We start with belief-dependent motivations and show how to embed them in game forms to obtain psychological games. We emphasize the role of time and of the perception of players' intentions. We take advantage of progress made on the foundations of game theory to expand and improve on PGT solution concepts. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | ERCEuropean Research Council (ERC) [324219]; Marco Fanno scholarship | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | ELSEVIER | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | |
dc.subject | Psychological game theory | en_US |
dc.subject | Belief-dependent motivation | en_US |
dc.subject | Intentions | en_US |
dc.subject | Time | en_US |
dc.subject | Rationalizability | en_US |
dc.subject | Self-confirming equilibrium | en_US |
dc.subject | Bayesian sequential equilibrium | en_US |
dc.title | Incorporating belief-dependent motivation in games | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Univ Arizona | en_US |
dc.identifier.journal | JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION | en_US |
dc.description.note | 36 month embargo; published online: 24 June 2019 | en_US |
dc.description.collectioninformation | This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu. | en_US |
dc.eprint.version | Final accepted manuscript | en_US |
dc.source.volume | 167 | |
dc.source.beginpage | 185-218 |