Express busways and economic development: Case study of the Miami-Dade South Express Busway
Name:
Express Busways and Economic ...
Size:
531.4Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTDCitation
Nelson, A. C., & Hibberd, R. (2019). Express busways and economic development: Case study of the Miami-Dade South Express Busway. Research in Transportation Economics, 77, 100731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2019.05.004 Rights
Copyright © 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
This is the first study reporting the association between economic development and express bus transit (XBT) service. Using shift-share analysis applied to the South Miami-Dade express busway transit system, this study assesses differences in shift-share outcomes over three time periods: before the Great Recession (2004–2007), during the Great Recession and early recovery years (2008–2011), and after the Great Recession (2012–2014). Over the entire study period (2004–2014), total jobs grew within one-half mile of XBT stations. Using shift-share analysis, we find that (a) XBT station areas gained share of jobs relative to the central county (Miami-Dade) before the Great Recession, (b) continued to gain share albeit at a slower pace during the Great Recession, but (c) lost share during the post Great Recession period. Over the entire study period, land-extensive jobs (such as in manufacturing and non-manufacturing industry) lost share as did lower-wage retail-lodging-food service jobs. Jobs in knowledge, office, education and arts-entertainment-recreation economic groups gained share overall. Since the Great Recession, we surmise that XBT stations have shifted firm dynamics mostly by displacing land extensive or lower wage jobs away from station areas. Planning and policy implications are offered.Note
24 month embargo; published online: 1 November 2019ISSN
0739-8859Version
Final accepted manuscriptSponsors
National Institute of Transportation and Communities; Utah Transit Authority; Portland Metro; TriMet; Lane County Transit; City of Provo UT; Transportation for America; City of Tucson; Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada; Mid America Regional Councilae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.retrec.2019.05.004