Vegetation source water identification using isotopic and hydrometric observations from a subhumid mountain catchment
Name:
TCA_vegetation_source_water_id ...
Size:
6.072Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Accepted Manuscript
Author
Dwivedi, RavindraEastoe, Christopher
Knowles, John F.
Wright, William E.
Hamann, Lejon
Minor, Rebecca
Mitra, Bhaskar
Meixner, Tom
McIntosh, Jennifer
Ty Ferre, Paul A.
Castro, Christopher
Niu, Gou‐Yue
Barron‐Gafford, Greg A.
Abramson, Nate
Papuga, Shirley A.
Stanley, Michael
Hu, Jia
Chorover, Jon
Affiliation
Univ Arizona, Dept Hydrol & Atmospher SciUniv Arizona, Dept Geosci
Univ Arizona, Sch Geog & Dev
Univ Arizona, Lab Tree Ring Res
Univ Arizona, Biosphere 2
Univ Arizona, Sch Nat Resources & Environm
Univ Arizona, Dept Soil Water & Environm Sci
Issue Date
2019-10-30Keywords
ecohydrological nichemountains
plant water dynamics
soil water
stable water isotopes
subsurface storage
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
WILEYCitation
Dwivedi R, Eastoe C, Knowles JF, et al. Vegetation source water identification using isotopic and hydrometric observations from a subhumid mountain catchment. Ecohydrology. 20; e2167.https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2167Journal
ECOHYDROLOGYRights
Copyright © 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
This study coupled long‐term hydrometric and stable water isotope data to identify links between subsurface water storage and vegetation in a subhumid mountain catchment in Arizona, USA. Specific observations included catchment‐scale hydrologic fluxes and soil water storage and stable water isotopes from stream water, soil water, groundwater, and sap water from Arizona pine (Pinus arizonica) and Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) individuals. Here, we find that tightly bound soil water was sufficient to meet dry period vegetation water demand when the former was defined in terms of field capacity as opposed to a matric tension threshold. This water was a mixture of summer and winter precipitation that predominates in both shallow and deep soil waters, and contributed significantly to streamflow. We also identified a less common mobile water type that did not contribute significantly to streamflow and was related to infiltration during isotopically depleted precipitation events. Although each water type was used by both Arizona pine and Douglas fir vegetation, the second water type was dominant in Douglas fir sap water. Therefore, we conclude that Arizona pine and Douglas fir can occupy different ecohydrological niches at this subhumid mountain location. Further, a lack of isotopic distinction between tightly bound and inferred mobile soil water signals that the ecohydrological water source separation hypothesis is not entirely applicable at this site. The results of this study broadly highlight how alternative definitions of tightly bound water can influence interpretation of data, and contribute to a more thorough understanding of interactions between subsurface storage and plant water dynamics.Note
12 month embargo; published online: 30 October 2019ISSN
1936-0584DOI
10.1002/eco.2167Version
Final accepted manuscriptae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1002/eco.2167